Thanks for confirming that.
So what does that mean in terms of our standards for release? How do I
apply the rules for assessing things here?

Can I understand clarity about this wording:

At a minimum you would be expected to check that:
....
- That the build script completes successfully
- That you can compile and crosscompile a simple example using the SDK.


I realise that this is a configuration issue with the build of one example
only. I feel comfortable that the framework part is building ok and
although I did not check with outside projects, I tested a few of
the built examples, and those that built (that I tested) were fine.

I guess it comes down to: does the 'build script' referred to above include
the examples or not?  If the 'build script' includes the examples, (as it
does in CI build), then I cannot in good conscience agree that it
'completes successfully'.


On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 6:17 PM Alex Harui <[email protected]> wrote:

> I flushed my snapshots and TDJ didn't build.
>
> On 5/8/20, 10:49 PM, "Alex Harui" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     You're probably right.  I haven't tested if it would build if I
> flushed all snapshots from my local repo.
>
>     IMO, something to fix for the next release.
>
>     -Alex
>
>     On 5/8/20, 10:01 PM, "Greg Dove" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>         Actually looking at the pom for TDJ, there is a
>
>          <id>copy-themes</id>
>                     <phase>generate-resources</phase>
>                     <goals>
>                       <goal>unpack</goal>
>                     </goals>
>
>         which looks like it is set up for snapshot versions of themes to be
>         unpacked.
>
>          <version>0.9.7-SNAPSHOT</version>
>
>
>         I don't know if this is a problem or not (or the cause of the
> other problem
>         I am seeing or not).
>
>         Appreciate any guidance....
>         Thanks,
>         Greg
>
>         On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 4:46 PM Greg Dove <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>         >
>         > Alex, Yishay, I tried today as well.
>         >
>         > FWIW I was able to get the js version to work, and complete the
>         > ApproveRoyale sequence for that.
>         >
>         > I tried the use-flash variation 3 tiimes so far, and did not
> complete
>         > it, so keen to find out what I am doing wrong.
>         > I am using the same environment variables configuration that I
> used daily
>         > for regular builds.
>         > Everything works through to TourDeJewel, at which point it hangs
> in the
>         > compilation of the app.
>         >
>         > Prior to that I am seeing things that I don't (believe I)
> normally see for
>         > all of the Jewel theme prior to the TDJ compilation:
>         >
>         > [WARNING] Could not transfer metadata
>         >
> org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml
>         > from/to apache.snapshots (
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5673a89559ab4f9192c608d7f3dcac51%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246001469299485&amp;sdata=c%2BNzoQ%2B2TeCCi2XPrf0Y%2FGDaajkep8Qcyi8sGXhBpvg%3D&amp;reserved=0
> ):
>         > Failed to transfer file:
>         >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fframework%2FJewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme%2F0.9.7-SNAPSHOT%2Fmaven-metadata.xml&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5673a89559ab4f9192c608d7f3dcac51%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246001469309474&amp;sdata=FABqDDjhbfIXoQ7ojev4S4hf25enNBv8CkYOjeAbeAI%3D&amp;reserved=0
> .
>         > Return code is: 500 , ReasonPhrase:Server Error.
>         > [WARNING] Failure to transfer
>         >
> org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml
>         > from
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5673a89559ab4f9192c608d7f3dcac51%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246001469309474&amp;sdata=suEB6T3ssj2WqO%2FIXdhdyUpcHj8qUVZJGXe9%2By8hpL8%3D&amp;reserved=0
> was cached in the local
>         > repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update
> interval of
>         > apache.snapshots has elapsed or updates are forced. Original
> error: Could
>         > not transfer metadata
>         >
> org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml
>         > from/to apache.snapshots (
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5673a89559ab4f9192c608d7f3dcac51%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246001469309474&amp;sdata=suEB6T3ssj2WqO%2FIXdhdyUpcHj8qUVZJGXe9%2By8hpL8%3D&amp;reserved=0
> ):
>         > Failed to transfer file:
>         >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fframework%2FJewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme%2F0.9.7-SNAPSHOT%2Fmaven-metadata.xml&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5673a89559ab4f9192c608d7f3dcac51%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246001469309474&amp;sdata=FABqDDjhbfIXoQ7ojev4S4hf25enNBv8CkYOjeAbeAI%3D&amp;reserved=0
> .
>         > Return code is: 500 , ReasonPhrase:Server Error.
>         > [INFO] Configured Artifact:
>         >
> org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Red-Theme:js:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT:swc
>         > [INFO] Configured Artifact:
>         >
> org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sapphire-Theme:js:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT:swc
>         >
>         > I don't understand why it is trying to load snapshot versions of
> the
>         > themes, or what is going on here. or even if that is causing the
> problem
>         > later with the TDJ compilation or not.
>         >
>         > Does anyone have any clues?
>         > Thanks,
>         > Greg
>         >
>         > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 6:31 AM Alex Harui
> <[email protected]>
>         > wrote:
>         >
>         >> Carlos,
>         >>
>         >> What scenario are you testing?  If you are using "
> -Duse-flash=true" then
>         >> is PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME and other environment variable set up
> properly?
>         >>
>         >> -Alex
>         >>
>         >> On 5/8/20, 10:21 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>         >>
>         >>     Hi,
>         >>
>         >>     I had a similar experience with approve xml, so I'll check
> as I have
>         >> more
>         >>     time during weekend in other way:
>         >>
>         >>     build_example.compile:
>         >>
>         >>     Compiling Ace.swf
>         >>
>         >>     ROYALE_HOME:
>         >>
>         >>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs
>         >>
>         >>     ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME:
>         >>
>         >>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/js
>         >>
>         >>     GOOG_HOME:
>         >>
>         >>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/js/lib/google/closure-library
>         >>
>         >>     MXMLJSC
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
> -load-config+=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/royale/Ace/src/main/config/compile-app-config.xml
>         >>
>         >>     +playerglobal.version=11.1
>         >>
>         >>     +env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flash/Player
>         >>
>         >>     -compiler.debug=true
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
> +royalelib=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
> -closure-lib=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/js/lib/google/closure-library
>         >>
>         >>     +configname=royale
>         >>
>         >>     -swf-version
>         >>
>         >>     14
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
> -output=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/royale/Ace/bin-debug/Ace.swf
>         >>
>         >>     --
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/royale/Ace/src/main/royale/Ace.mxml
>         >>
>         >>     0.655243136 seconds
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml(74):
>         >>     col: 0 Error: unable to open
>         >>
>         >>
> '/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/libs/player/11.1/playerglobal.swc'.
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml
>         >>     (line: 74)
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>           </external-library-path>
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>     BUILD FAILED
>         >>
>         >>
>  /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/ApproveRoyale.xml:781: The
>         >>     following error occurred while executing this line:
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/build.xml:659:
>         >>     The following error occurred while executing this line:
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/build.xml:77:
>         >>     The following error occurred while executing this line:
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/build_example.xml:157:
>         >>     mxmlc task failed.
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>     Total time: 6 minutes 44 seconds
>         >>
>         >>     El vie., 8 may. 2020 a las 13:44, Yishay Weiss (<
>         >> [email protected]>)
>         >>     escribió:
>         >>
>         >>     > Rc4 had an xml bug, rc3 couldn’t build maven from
> distribution
>         >> sources. I
>         >>     > tested ApproveRoyale.xml and it worked for me for this
> release.
>         >>     >
>         >>     > From: Piotr Zarzycki<mailto:[email protected]>
>         >>     > Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 2:40 PM
>         >>     > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:
> [email protected]>
>         >>     > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.7
>         >>     >
>         >>     > What are the changes in comparison to the previous RC? I'm
>         >> interested
>         >>     > whether I can use  ApproveRoyale.xml
>         >>     > <
>         >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2FApproveRoyale.xml&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5673a89559ab4f9192c608d7f3dcac51%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246001469309474&amp;sdata=fb7TPt8w99nBA6XainkulIxnS6yE7DZzpxB88B3fQRU%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>     > >
>         >>     > script
>         >>     > ?
>         >>     >
>         >>     > pt., 8 maj 2020 o 13:29 <[email protected]>
> napisał(a):
>         >>     >
>         >>     > > This is the discussion thread.
>         >>     > >
>         >>     > > Thanks,
>         >>     > > Yishay Weiss
>         >>     >
>         >>     >
>         >>     >
>         >>     > --
>         >>     >
>         >>     > Piotr Zarzycki
>         >>     >
>         >>     > Patreon: *
>         >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5673a89559ab4f9192c608d7f3dcac51%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246001469309474&amp;sdata=tCYsNkFH0Aq%2FPUSHDix97dBf8%2FVd5pMT6BHPdvsQjLQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>     > <
>         >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5673a89559ab4f9192c608d7f3dcac51%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246001469309474&amp;sdata=tCYsNkFH0Aq%2FPUSHDix97dBf8%2FVd5pMT6BHPdvsQjLQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >> >*
>         >>     >
>         >>     >
>         >>
>         >>     --
>         >>     Carlos Rovira
>         >>
>         >>
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&amp;data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C5673a89559ab4f9192c608d7f3dcac51%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246001469309474&amp;sdata=HanXAncqzaXgAem0stZeHaggXUrnlVQAs8j2uwjO1ro%3D&amp;reserved=0
>         >>
>         >>
>         >>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to