Hi Guys, I run into the same problem with TDJ and Maven build as you. However I have a question - ApproveRoyale.xml - build first stuff by ANT, next Maven - as I remember in the results of that build by ANT I should have somewhere IDE ready to use SDK - where it should be ?
Thanks, Piotr niedz., 10 maj 2020 o 23:12 Greg Dove <[email protected]> napisał(a): > I created this for now: > https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Notes-0.9.7 > > Feel free to improve it as you see fit. > > > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 1:21 PM Alex Harui <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > We definitely should try to prevent these problems, but the > responsibility > > for fixing it and preventing it in the future is not the RMs, it is the > all > > of our responsibility. So if you can think of a way to clear snapshots, > > add it to the approval script. If you can think of a way to scan poms > for > > -SNAPSHOT, add that too, although we currently do use a few snapshots as > > build tools. I haven't looked at the pom for TDJ but it could be that it > > should not use explicit versions but rather, a property that is set by > the > > 13 steps. The online release notes may need to be created in the wiki. > > Feel free to pitch in and do that, and add whatever you think will help > our > > users. > > > > My 2 cents, > > -Alex > > > > On 5/9/20, 3:49 PM, "Greg Dove" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks, I generally agree with that, although I don't think it > should > > ever > > be an excuse for avoiding improvements to enhance quality in the > > future, > > and we should make sure we avoid this specifically in the future. > > Nothing is perfect, software development is not particularly unique > in > > that > > regard. But we can assure 'quality' if we have specific standards to > > meet. > > So hopefully it makes sense that ensuring that all examples build > > (same as > > CI) for future releases makes sense. > > > > So I will apply the same approach as you for now and vote EOD my time > > after > > a few more checks. > > I don't know if there is a 'fix' for this for the future, unless the > 13 > > steps 'automate' the search and replace in pom files for version > > 'SNAPSHOT' > > and for some reason this part is being skipped. Otherwise if it is a > > manual > > 'search-and-replace in files' step, then it is probably just > > something to > > note for the next release. > > Perhaps the approve script can be set to clear the snapshots from > > local m2 > > so we always trap this early? > > > > Maybe for this release, the 'fix' can go in as advice in the > > post-release > > release notes? With or without a patch (I have one - I was able to > > complete > > the ApproveRoyale script after fixing the pom file). > > Also hopefully we can get to 0.9.8 quickly, which should be possible > > now > > with all the work that has been put into the release process, that > > definitely limits the impact of something like this. > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 8:14 AM Alex Harui <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > I voted +1 because the default build scripts for our repos do not > > build > > > examples. Most of the examples do build. Please fix or file bugs > > for the > > > problems you found. I'm sure other bugs will eventually be found > and > > > filed. The release does not have to be perfect. > > > > > > I also voted +1 because, despite the problems reported so far, it > is > > my > > > opinion that the project and community are better off having this > > package > > > as its official release instead of having PMC members spend more > > energy on > > > the release instead of features and fixes our users really need. > > There > > > appear to be simple workarounds for the problems reported. > > > > > > I don't think there are any absolute definitions. It is often a > > judgement > > > call since software is rarely perfect. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Alex > > > > > > On 5/9/20, 12:56 PM, "Greg Dove" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for confirming that. > > > So what does that mean in terms of our standards for release? > > How do I > > > apply the rules for assessing things here? > > > > > > Can I understand clarity about this wording: > > > > > > At a minimum you would be expected to check that: > > > .... > > > - That the build script completes successfully > > > - That you can compile and crosscompile a simple example using > > the SDK. > > > > > > > > > I realise that this is a configuration issue with the build of > > one > > > example > > > only. I feel comfortable that the framework part is building ok > > and > > > although I did not check with outside projects, I tested a few > of > > > the built examples, and those that built (that I tested) were > > fine. > > > > > > I guess it comes down to: does the 'build script' referred to > > above > > > include > > > the examples or not? If the 'build script' includes the > > examples, (as > > > it > > > does in CI build), then I cannot in good conscience agree that > it > > > 'completes successfully'. > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 6:17 PM Alex Harui > > <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I flushed my snapshots and TDJ didn't build. > > > > > > > > On 5/8/20, 10:49 PM, "Alex Harui" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > You're probably right. I haven't tested if it would > build > > if I > > > > flushed all snapshots from my local repo. > > > > > > > > IMO, something to fix for the next release. > > > > > > > > -Alex > > > > > > > > On 5/8/20, 10:01 PM, "Greg Dove" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Actually looking at the pom for TDJ, there is a > > > > > > > > <id>copy-themes</id> > > > > <phase>generate-resources</phase> > > > > <goals> > > > > <goal>unpack</goal> > > > > </goals> > > > > > > > > which looks like it is set up for snapshot versions > of > > > themes to be > > > > unpacked. > > > > > > > > <version>0.9.7-SNAPSHOT</version> > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if this is a problem or not (or the > cause > > of the > > > > other problem > > > > I am seeing or not). > > > > > > > > Appreciate any guidance.... > > > > Thanks, > > > > Greg > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 4:46 PM Greg Dove < > > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Alex, Yishay, I tried today as well. > > > > > > > > > > FWIW I was able to get the js version to work, and > > > complete the > > > > > ApproveRoyale sequence for that. > > > > > > > > > > I tried the use-flash variation 3 tiimes so far, > and > > did > > > not > > > > complete > > > > > it, so keen to find out what I am doing wrong. > > > > > I am using the same environment variables > > configuration > > > that I > > > > used daily > > > > > for regular builds. > > > > > Everything works through to TourDeJewel, at which > > point it > > > hangs > > > > in the > > > > > compilation of the app. > > > > > > > > > > Prior to that I am seeing things that I don't > > (believe I) > > > > normally see for > > > > > all of the Jewel theme prior to the TDJ > compilation: > > > > > > > > > > [WARNING] Could not transfer metadata > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml > > > > > from/to apache.snapshots ( > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8f0434df56b24274577a08d7f46b4b87%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246613980395149&sdata=20%2BRq6%2BBI0R%2BRPMEpDlI5MY5MEZwRX1KIa7fOjlgUDo%3D&reserved=0 > > > > ): > > > > > Failed to transfer file: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fframework%2FJewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme%2F0.9.7-SNAPSHOT%2Fmaven-metadata.xml&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8f0434df56b24274577a08d7f46b4b87%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246613980395149&sdata=Uri8bdl9ZK9qa0gfIEULLNj840A0ay0L8FyXzF0UIsA%3D&reserved=0 > > > > . > > > > > Return code is: 500 , ReasonPhrase:Server Error. > > > > > [WARNING] Failure to transfer > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8f0434df56b24274577a08d7f46b4b87%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246613980395149&sdata=20%2BRq6%2BBI0R%2BRPMEpDlI5MY5MEZwRX1KIa7fOjlgUDo%3D&reserved=0 > > > > was cached in the local > > > > > repository, resolution will not be reattempted > until > > the > > > update > > > > interval of > > > > > apache.snapshots has elapsed or updates are forced. > > > Original > > > > error: Could > > > > > not transfer metadata > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml > > > > > from/to apache.snapshots ( > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8f0434df56b24274577a08d7f46b4b87%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246613980395149&sdata=20%2BRq6%2BBI0R%2BRPMEpDlI5MY5MEZwRX1KIa7fOjlgUDo%3D&reserved=0 > > > > ): > > > > > Failed to transfer file: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fsnapshots%2Forg%2Fapache%2Froyale%2Fframework%2FJewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Orange-Theme%2F0.9.7-SNAPSHOT%2Fmaven-metadata.xml&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8f0434df56b24274577a08d7f46b4b87%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246613980395149&sdata=Uri8bdl9ZK9qa0gfIEULLNj840A0ay0L8FyXzF0UIsA%3D&reserved=0 > > > > . > > > > > Return code is: 500 , ReasonPhrase:Server Error. > > > > > [INFO] Configured Artifact: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Red-Theme:js:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT:swc > > > > > [INFO] Configured Artifact: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > org.apache.royale.framework:Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Sapphire-Theme:js:0.9.7-SNAPSHOT:swc > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand why it is trying to load > snapshot > > > versions of > > > > the > > > > > themes, or what is going on here. or even if that > is > > > causing the > > > > problem > > > > > later with the TDJ compilation or not. > > > > > > > > > > Does anyone have any clues? > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Greg > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 6:31 AM Alex Harui > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Carlos, > > > > >> > > > > >> What scenario are you testing? If you are using " > > > > -Duse-flash=true" then > > > > >> is PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME and other environment > variable > > set up > > > > properly? > > > > >> > > > > >> -Alex > > > > >> > > > > >> On 5/8/20, 10:21 AM, "Carlos Rovira" < > > > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> Hi, > > > > >> > > > > >> I had a similar experience with approve xml, > so > > I'll > > > check > > > > as I have > > > > >> more > > > > >> time during weekend in other way: > > > > >> > > > > >> build_example.compile: > > > > >> > > > > >> Compiling Ace.swf > > > > >> > > > > >> ROYALE_HOME: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs > > > > >> > > > > >> ROYALE_COMPILER_HOME: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/js > > > > >> > > > > >> GOOG_HOME: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/js/lib/google/closure-library > > > > >> > > > > >> MXMLJSC > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -load-config+=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/royale/Ace/src/main/config/compile-app-config.xml > > > > >> > > > > >> +playerglobal.version=11.1 > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > +env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Users/carlosrovira/Dev/Flash/Player > > > > >> > > > > >> -compiler.debug=true > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > +royalelib=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/ > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -closure-lib=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/js/lib/google/closure-library > > > > >> > > > > >> +configname=royale > > > > >> > > > > >> -swf-version > > > > >> > > > > >> 14 > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > -output=/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/royale/Ace/bin-debug/Ace.swf > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/royale/Ace/src/main/royale/Ace.mxml > > > > >> > > > > >> 0.655243136 seconds > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml(74): > > > > >> col: 0 Error: unable to open > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > '/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/libs/player/11.1/playerglobal.swc'. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/frameworks/royale-config.xml > > > > >> (line: 74) > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> </external-library-path> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> BUILD FAILED > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/ApproveRoyale.xml:781: > > > The > > > > >> following error occurred while executing this > > line: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/build.xml:659: > > > > >> The following error occurred while executing > > this > > > line: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/build.xml:77: > > > > >> The following error occurred while executing > > this > > > line: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/royale097rc5/apache-royale-0.9.7-src/royale-asjs/examples/build_example.xml:157: > > > > >> mxmlc task failed. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> Total time: 6 minutes 44 seconds > > > > >> > > > > >> El vie., 8 may. 2020 a las 13:44, Yishay Weiss > > (< > > > > >> [email protected]>) > > > > >> escribió: > > > > >> > > > > >> > Rc4 had an xml bug, rc3 couldn’t build maven > > from > > > > distribution > > > > >> sources. I > > > > >> > tested ApproveRoyale.xml and it worked for > me > > for > > > this > > > > release. > > > > >> > > > > > >> > From: Piotr Zarzycki<mailto: > > > [email protected]> > > > > >> > Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 2:40 PM > > > > >> > To: Apache Royale Development<mailto: > > > > [email protected]> > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release > Apache > > > Royale 0.9.7 > > > > >> > > > > > >> > What are the changes in comparison to the > > previous > > > RC? I'm > > > > >> interested > > > > >> > whether I can use ApproveRoyale.xml > > > > >> > < > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdist.apache.org%2Frepos%2Fdist%2Fdev%2Froyale%2F0.9.7%2Frc5%2FApproveRoyale.xml&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8f0434df56b24274577a08d7f46b4b87%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246613980395149&sdata=BsdRIUFMatRAO7C5QtFmoQK0ML64jhrLHs9KJ0wrd4I%3D&reserved=0 > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > script > > > > >> > ? > > > > >> > > > > > >> > pt., 8 maj 2020 o 13:29 < > > [email protected]> > > > > napisał(a): > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > This is the discussion thread. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > > >> > > Yishay Weiss > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Patreon: * > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8f0434df56b24274577a08d7f46b4b87%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246613980405146&sdata=x2EZ8TqMkdbu3CVVO1zAMqkT5L6Ezpy2cX5s8UBDaUA%3D&reserved=0 > > > > >> > < > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8f0434df56b24274577a08d7f46b4b87%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246613980405146&sdata=x2EZ8TqMkdbu3CVVO1zAMqkT5L6Ezpy2cX5s8UBDaUA%3D&reserved=0 > > > > >> >* > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> -- > > > > >> Carlos Rovira > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fabout.me%2Fcarlosrovira&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8f0434df56b24274577a08d7f46b4b87%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637246613980405146&sdata=Q2bFpaJhnU7mIQESmYabmTiNuuExQdnvwxuAyWLnsxk%3D&reserved=0 > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>*
