Hi, 0.10.0 would be actually more accurate since we still are doing many changes. In case we do bugfixes, 0.9.x will the right way to go.
So yes, I think that should be improved to have a better version number in releases Thanks Chris for pointing that Carlos El vie., 29 may. 2020 a las 13:16, Christofer Dutz (< [email protected]>) escribió: > And I greatly appreciated this step :-) > > So thanks for doing that Piotr. > > Chris > > > Am 29.05.20, 11:14 schrieb "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]>: > > That's why I have created separate mailing list, cause you were not > only > who reported obfuscation of mailing list with lot's of Jenkins > notifications. > > pt., 29 maj 2020 o 11:06 Andrew Wetmore <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > > > If there was such a discussion and decision, it might have been taken > > before Royale forked from Flex. But it's never too late to talk: > should the > > next release extending features be 0.10.0? > > > > Andrew > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 5:31 AM Christofer Dutz < > [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > one thing I noticed when trying the release of 0.9.7 was that you > are > > > counting the bugfix version up … is there a reason for this? > > > I mean I understand you are hesitant (like us in the PLC4X > project) to do > > > the 1.0, but what’s special with the 0.9? > > > Wouldn’t it be possible to do a 0.10.0 release and really use the > third > > > digit for bugfix releases (If needed)? > > > > > > I am sure there was a discussion on this and all I’m asking for is > a > > > pointer to this … using ponymail on the dev list is sort of ugly > as it > > > feels like 90% of it’s content is Jenkins emails. > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki > <https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki>* > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
