It's probably technically possible, but I don't think that there's anything like that built into RoyaleUnit at this time.
In JS, we could check if a particular URL query parameter is set. In SWF, we could check for a "FlashVars" parameter. If the paramter exists, RoyaleUnit's CIRunner could use it. Otherwise, it would fall back to the default port. Again, this doesn't exist right now, but I think that it would be possible. -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:19 PM Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Hi Josh, > > I think that was pretty much the same way it worked with Flexmojos. > > I do recall the problem then being that the server had to allocate a > socket and to use that number in the compilation of the test-runner. > I always thought this was problematic. > > Do you have a way of calling the runner and passing along the port so the > client will connect to dynamically allocated ports? > > Chris > > > Am 01.06.20, 17:41 schrieb "Josh Tynjala" <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>: > > Sure, let's get this figured out! > > Some background: For the RoyaleUnit Ant task, I basically created a > fork of > the original FlexUnit Ant task. The task runs a server that listens for > socket connections from Royale apps, and the apps report their test > results > over the socket. For the SWF side, I don't think that I needed to > change > anything. It just worked. For the JS side, I needed to add support for > connections over WebSockets because raw sockets aren't supported in > JS/HTML. > > -- > Josh Tynjala > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 3:41 AM Christofer Dutz < > christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > wrote: > > > Starting a new thread about this … don’t enjoy too multi-topic > monster > > threads. > > > > Hi all and specially Josh. > > > > I was told that you added something RoyaleUint which should work the > same > > way as the old FlexUnit … great thing. This definitively was missing. > > Currently it seems that these tests can be run in an Ant build but > not in > > a Maven build. > > > > We should change that ASAP :-) > > > > Having worked a lot on Flexmojos I think I have a fair idea of how we > > could integrate this into a new Royale surefire runner. > > > > Would you: Josh be interested with working on this with me? I bet I > will > > have some questions. > > > > Chris > > > > > > > >
