It would be a bit of a hack, but the compiler could probably be changed to peek at the xml namespaces in the specified .mxml file and select the flex-config.xml if it sees mx/spark.
HTH, -Alex On 6/25/20, 3:35 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected]> wrote: I think that option should be mentioned in documentation and it is setup in every example which is using MX - At least for Moonshine projects. In other cases I don't think it should be setup as default. czw., 25 cze 2020 o 12:28 Yishay Weiss <[email protected]> napisał(a): > I think it’s a question of the most common use-case. In either case it’s a > matter of setting a configuration to either royale or flex. My feeling is > that newbies are more likely to be looking for the emulation components at > this point. > > From: Harbs<mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 1:09 PM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Make config: flex default? > > I don’t think so. We made it optional because there were conflicts in the > CSS definitions. > > > On Jun 25, 2020, at 11:20 AM, Yishay Weiss <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > We’ve been seeing new users trying to convert their applications from > Flex and getting errors which, I think, can be solved by setting the config > compiler option to ‘flex’. Should we make that the default? > > > > -- Piotr Zarzycki Patreon: *https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4b29a91245724c233df408d818f3823c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637286781422251833&sdata=U%2Blgv%2BZI56Jy7gqE0POW8oPBcUFh69FWpMeOkdHQl9M%3D&reserved=0 <https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzycki&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C4b29a91245724c233df408d818f3823c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637286781422251833&sdata=U%2Blgv%2BZI56Jy7gqE0POW8oPBcUFh69FWpMeOkdHQl9M%3D&reserved=0>*
