ok Harbs thanks El vie., 26 jun. 2020 a las 10:41, Harbs (<[email protected]>) escribió:
> I think I’m going to create a new repo with just the typedefs we’re using. > This should make it easier to fix and add typedefs in the future. > > > On Jun 25, 2020, at 4:53 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Harbs, > > > > thanks for taking a look. Hope you can solve it and update accordingly. > > Maybe we should as well discuss about the need of some infrastructure > > behind (ES6?)...but maybe in other thread at other time. At least see how > > people see the actual needs. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > El mié., 24 jun. 2020 a las 22:28, Harbs (<[email protected]>) > escribió: > > > >> It needs to be added to typedefs. The definitions are in > web_animations.js > >> > >> I just tried to do that and I ran into the following difficulties: > >> > >> 1. I noticed that the royale-extra files are very out of date and > missing > >> the animation defs completely. I tried updating those and broke some > tests. > >> 2. I also noticed that typed have been more strictly defined, so using > the > >> newer definitions will require adding more definition files for the > missing > >> classes (i.e. geometry) > >> 3. I also noticed that the closure-compiler files that are downloaded > are > >> old ones which don’t have changes including the necessary > web_animations.js > >> file. I’m not sure the best way of solving that problem. We can’t use a > >> newer version of closure-compiler because it’s going to require > >> royale-compiler changes. > >> > >> I’m going to look at this again tomorrow, but I figured I should sum up > >> what I hit in case someone else wants to take a stab at it… > >> > >> Harbs > >> > >>> On Jun 24, 2020, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Rovira <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> currently to use the animate API [1], I need to use brackets > >>> > >>> In jewel I have some examples of this: > >>> > >>> indicator_content["animate"](... > >>> > >>> or > >>> > >>> animation = element["animate"](... > >>> > >>> would be good to be able a dot access so we can do > >>> someHTMLelement.animate(...) > >>> > >>> In fact the API is ready and maybe we are missing to support it. > >>> > >>> Thoughts? > >>> > >>> [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/es/docs/Web/API/Element/animate > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Carlos Rovira > >>> http://about.me/carlosrovira > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Carlos Rovira > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
