OK, thanks. Alex Harui <[email protected]> escreveu no dia segunda, 6/07/2020 à(s) 17:33:
> Classes in the org.apache.royale.* packages are intended to be simple, > lightweight (and thus hopefully faster), PAYG classes that can be > composited into more complex implementations. They are not intended to be > backward-compatible with Flex. > > That said, I don't think a lot of features have been made available as > beads for SimpleRemoteObject since most users want to use the more > backward-compatible RemoteObject in MXRoyale. > > HTH, > -Alex > > On 7/6/20, 1:21 AM, "Hugo Ferreira" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is the new SimpleRemoteObject some how better comparing to > MX:RemoteObject > in performance or at the end of the day it's the same thing? > > >
