Hi all, Thanks to Carlos' off-list tip I had another look at the "module-output" compiler option. From a look at the documentation it looked as if it would just copy stuff somewhere else, but it actually does what I was doing with the replacer. So I was able to clean up my configuration quite a bit, however still when loading the duplicate classes I am getting errors.
I hope with this compiler option I'll be able to also use the js-release versions ... will try that out asap. Chris Am 24.08.20, 22:08 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>: Hi Carlos, I had used your blog post to create my initial version ... but I added your copy-resources solution to stage my test-code. Thanks for that. But I also needed to replace the goog.addDependency urls in all of the modules to use the relative path or my modules wouldn't load. Now it's working, as I said yesterday, but if a module uses a class that the main application also provides I get an error as soon as the the module tries to add the already loaded type ... it doesn't cause an error, but I get error reports in the developer-tools. Chris Am 24.08.20, 12:19 schrieb "Carlos Rovira" <[email protected]>: Hi Chris, I solved that in blog example [1] via maven [2]. Maybe a hack similar to what you did? Anyway I think I vaguely remember to see something related to that in repo, going to check and see if I find it and will come back. I think this could be improved. [1] https://royale.apache.org/dividing-an-apache-royale-application-with-modules/ [2] https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/blob/fad51dad1cc77d27492dbf224233179da8483e36/examples/blog/BE0013_Dividing_an_Apache_Royale_application_with_modules/JewelModule/pom.xml#L48 El dom., 23 ago. 2020 a las 22:44, Christofer Dutz (< [email protected]>) escribió: > Ok ... so my replace plugin hack worked. > > Now I got the next little issue: > > - If a module declares a type which was declared somewhere else, I am > getting errors in the browser, however the application still seems to work. > > Is there a way to tell the system to not fire errors if a type was already > declared? > > Chris > > > > Am 23.08.20, 22:04 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>: > > Ok ... so I got even further. > > If I modify the TestAModule__deps.js file and replaced the "../../../" > prefixes with "../../../main/TestAModule/". > It seems to work ... so is there a way to have this generated by the > compiler? > > Otherwise I'll probably just have to use a replace maven plugin to > modify the files. > > Chris > > > Am 23.08.20, 21:24 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" < > [email protected]>: > > Ok ... so it seems to be picking up the "TestAModule__deps.js" > correctly ... > > However this tells the application to load stuff from the root (No > idea why all entries there have "../../../" as prefix. But it seems all > output files of Royale have this 3-segment prefix. > > Chris > > > Am 23.08.20, 20:57 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" < > [email protected]>: > > Hi all, > > today I extended my experiments to loading of modules. So as > soon as a user logs in, it gets a list of modules he’s allowed to use. > Then the application dynamically loads only these modules. > > So I managed to get the ModuleLoader to correctly load the css > file from a subdirectory: > > <j:SectionContent name="TestAModule"> > <j:ModuleLoader height="100%" width="100%" autoLoad="true" > moduleName="TestAModule" > modulePath="main/TestAModule"/> > </j:SectionContent> > > In the browser I can see it loading some stuff from the > subdirectory “main/TestAModule” … unfortunately it tries to load the js > file “TestAModule.js” from the root and not from that sub-directory. > > What do I have to do to make it load this from the right place? > > Chris > > > > > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
