Yes, it's not a blocker issue. I can avoid using super. Meanwhile, I filled a bug on github.
Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia terça, 15/09/2020 à(s) 23:29: > That looks like it probably needs a compiler fix. > But it also seems avoidable for now. > Because they are vars and not methods or accessors that are overridden, > can't you just avoid using super? > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:20 AM Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Example 1, using super to use the base base variable > > > > public class MyBaseClass > > { > > protected var myProtectedVar:String; > > } > > > > public class MyExtendedClass > > { > > public function MyExtendedClass > > { > > super.myProtecedVar = "Hello World"; // this will throw an JS > error > > at runtime > > } > > } > > > > Example 2, using super at an event > > > > call a remote AMF service to a resultHandler event: > > > > private function resultHandler(event:ResultEvent):void > > { > > super.entities = event.data as ArrayList; // this will throw an > > internal JS error that will stop the result event and fire the AMF fault > > event > > } > > >