Hi Chris, it seems people are ok with doing this. If we need to do some voting, we could do it. If not we could request the "royaleds" repo. Since you have more knowledge on this flow, better you handle it so we do in the apache way.
thanks! El mar., 15 sept. 2020 a las 9:23, Piotr Zarzycki (< [email protected]>) escribió: > Definitely Chris! Enjoy your meal ! ;) > > wt., 15 wrz 2020 o 09:17 Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> > napisał(a): > > > Lol ... good catch .. stupid phone __ > > > > Note to myself: Don't write emails on your phone during breakfast ... > > > > That should have been "RoyaleDS" __ > > > > Chris > > > > Am 15.09.20, 08:59 schrieb "Piotr Zarzycki" <[email protected] > >: > > > > Chris, > > > > Why Royales ? Do you suggest to have more than one project there ? > > > > wt., 15 wrz 2020 o 08:52 Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> > > napisał(a): > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Well if we want to do this, I would suggest a new git repository. > > For that > > > we should pick a name. I would suggest Royales. But that's > something > > that > > > has to be an act of the PMC (I think). > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > Von: Greg Dove <[email protected]> > > > Gesendet: Montag, 14. September 2020 22:18 > > > An: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]> > > > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] fork/move Apache Flex BlazeDS to Royale? > > > > > > I am not really familiar with any detail of BlazeDS, but this does > > sound > > > like a great idea to me, Chris. > > > If you can 'modernize' a version of BlazeDS that is increasingly > more > > > suitable for Royale, sounds like a really good fit for your > > knowledge and > > > experience. I'm not sure we have anyone else who would/could do > that. > > > I say 'go for it'! > > > +1 (if it's needed). > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:04 PM Raúl Núñez <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi: > > > > > > > > I totally agree with this update. So +1 :) :) > > > > > > > > Regards!! > > > > > > > > El lun., 14 sept. 2020 a las 10:58, Carlos Rovira (< > > > > [email protected]>) > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > > > > > I'm all for it. We really need BladeDS in Royale, so we should > > keep it > > > > with > > > > > the flow and also improve it for the actual needs. Spring Flex > > > > integration > > > > > is now dead, so bringing that too to keep it alive would be > very > > good. > > > > > > > > > > So it's ok for me to leave BladeDS in Flex in its current name > > and > > > > > versioning (and if there's any need in flex in forthcoming > years > > let > > > > others > > > > > do the patches they could need), and bring BlazeDS in its > > current state > > > > as > > > > > "RoyaleDS" here and start releasing new improvements for Royale > > with > > > the > > > > > new name. > > > > > > > > > > I think that also will make Royale stronger since we already > > support > > > the > > > > > main AMF implementation in this project. > > > > > > > > > > So +1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > El lun., 14 sept. 2020 a las 10:44, Christofer Dutz (< > > > > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > currently I’m using Apache Flex BlazeDS as backend for my > > Royale > > > > > > applications. > > > > > > > > > > > > This has somewhat become a little old and I do need to do > > quite some > > > > > > tweaking to get it working with Royale and especially with > new > > > Spring, > > > > > > Spring-Boot and Spring-Security. > > > > > > So I guess doing some update of that and re-releasing does > > sound > > > like a > > > > > > good idea. > > > > > > > > > > > > But I think it would be better to do a clean cut and optimize > > it for > > > > > usage > > > > > > with Royale. > > > > > > > > > > > > I’d even like to call it something “RoyaleDS” to make the > link > > > Rolyale > > > > + > > > > > > RoyaleDS a little more obvious than the old Flex + BlazeDS > > pair. > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now the Flex project seems like we’re keeping the > lights > > on in > > > an > > > > > > empty building and I doubt things will improve soon. Starting > > to move > > > > the > > > > > > things we want to keep on maintaining to Royale sounds like a > > good > > > > thing > > > > > to > > > > > > to. > > > > > > Perhaps even a stripped down version of the mavenizer. > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Piotr Zarzycki > > > > > > -- > > Piotr Zarzycki > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
