Hi,

we left our migrations untouched on the backend side. No single line
changed.

El mar., 6 oct. 2020 a las 15:53, Alina Kazi (<[email protected]>)
escribió:

> Hi,
> We haven't touched any config file see current file working with Royale.
> See links for remoting config and services config files.
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BhxMq4RjUJOcqVqjqWN-jXL1sE0eiB-V/view?usp=drivesdk
>
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bs9c5u9RkLQiuttSiLDHnjaGrvLEpnLV/view?usp=drivesdk
>
>
> Regards,
> Alina Kazi
>
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, 6:35 pm Sudhakar Kakaraparthi, <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your inputs :)
> >
> > Since service-config.xml file provided in Royale examples,  doesn't have
> > channel definitions for amf and secure-amf, so I curious if the amf and
> > secure-amf channels are supported by Royale or not? Has anyone
> implemented
> > amf channel with Royale?
> >
> > Carlos, sure you are right, I may need to check in that direction.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sudhakar.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Carlos Rovira [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2020 8:56 AM
> > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: RemoteObject error - Invalid Response type
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > just to give some more background. In our apps we are using as well the
> > same config as others and using channel sets too. So all that is working
> > fine. As Greg stated, the .txt in your config is not standard, so you
> > should check why you have it that way and how that was working in Flex.
> > Understanding the reason of that config could throw some light there.
> > Maybe you have some monkey patching in Flex.
> >
> > El mar., 6 oct. 2020 a las 14:43, Alina Kazi (<[email protected]>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Sudhakar,
> > > we were using websocket-amf with every ro.
> > >
> > > We had server and client running both on the same machine like u.
> > > I think you need to see the application-context.xml file or the
> > > configuration file you have.
> > > We have commented the channel set property from RO at many places.  We
> > > are using just the endpoint in RO and worked well for us.
> > >
> > > Give the destination class name and endpoint (whether it is local or
> > > server).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alina Kazi
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, 5:21 pm Sudhakar Kakaraparthi, <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > No, my server and ui code are together as a single war file, running
> > > > from my local on tomcat server.
> > > >
> > > > Alina, Royale example (SampleAmfWebApp) is a spring boot application
> > > > and ui is using websocket-amf channel. Whereas my use case is
> > > > traditional web application with ui and server bundled together as
> > > > single war file and I
> > > am
> > > > using amf channel. Have you used amf channel in your application?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Sudhakar.
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Hugo Ferreira [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2020 4:23 AM
> > > > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: Re: RemoteObject error - Invalid Response type
> > > >
> > > > Are you running your Royale App from your development environment
> > > > and
> > > your
> > > > server-side from your production server?
> > > > If you, you can use a plugin for that.
> > > > I use this one: Cross Domain - CORS.
> > > > I tested several and this one works very well.
> > > >
> > > > Alina Kazi <[email protected]> escreveu no dia terça, 6/10/2020
> > > > à(s)
> > > > 07:23:
> > > >
> > > > > Sudhakar,
> > > > >
> > > > > We have used remote object extensively in our application.
> > > > >
> > > > > Declaration
> > > > > <mx:RemoteObject id="roComp"
> > > > >
> > > > > endpoint="{parentMxmlDocument.parentMxmlDocument.parentMxmlDocumen
> > > > > t.Se
> > > > > rverURL}
> > > > > destination="dbzCompanySetupBO" />
> > > > >
> > > > > Call
> > > > > var responderComp1:Responder;
> > > > > var tokenComp1:AsyncToken;
> > > > > responderComp1 = new Responder(fn_roCompListRH,fn_HandleFault);
> > > > > tokenComp1 = roCompList.fn_GetCompListDP();
> > > > > tokenComp1.addResponder(responderComp1);
> > > > >                 trace(tokenComp1); I am sending you this with the
> > > > > reference of title of this thread,this might Help you. All other
> > > > > configuration files are same as they were in
> > > > Flex.
> > > > >
> > > > > Alina Kazi
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 6 Oct 2020, 8:11 am Sudhakar Kakaraparthi, <
> > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for your inputs,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I still getting same error. Please advise.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Sudhakar.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Hugo Ferreira [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2020 9:56 PM
> > > > > > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: RemoteObject error - Invalid Response type
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have cross domain and it's working.
> > > > > > One main endpoint that tells the client where should look at !
> > > > > > So the second endpoint would fail with the typical CORS error.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One this case you need to configure your server side.
> > > > > > On my case it's a ASP.NET and the only option that worked was to
> > > > > > configure web.config.\ So theorical this also should work for
> > > > > > other web server backend as PHP, etc ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Another important thing with the configuration is that you can
> > > > > > configure all the possibilities cross domains that you need,
> > > > > > avoinding this anoying errors but keeping the seurity (the best
> > > > > > all
> > > > worlds).
> > > > > > If a third party creates a new clone client, will not work in
> > > > > > production and gets this CORS error.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Greg Dove <[email protected]> escreveu no dia terça, 6/10/2020
> > > > > > à(s)
> > > > > > 02:34:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, http and https endpoints should work.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have not tried these with any cross-domain scenario in the
> > > > > > > past, so there may need to be CORS configuration for
> > > > > > > javascript (which is different to flash crossdomain.xml
> > > > > > > permissions model) in that
> > > > case.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 2:29 PM Sudhakar Kakaraparthi <
> > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks for the response Greg,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > These configurations are from previous my flex application,
> > > > > > > > let me try "messagebroker/amf". So amf and secure-amf
> > > > > > > > channels should be supported
> > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > Royale remote object, correct ?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Sudhakar.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: Greg Dove [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2020 9:18 PM
> > > > > > > > To: Apache Royale Development <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: RemoteObject error - Invalid Response type
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I can't really tell for sure what the problem is, but it
> > > > > > > > does look
> > > > > > > unusual
> > > > > > > > to have this in your endpoint:
> > > > > > > > messagebroker/amf.txt
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > usually that would be:
> > > > > > > > messagebroker/amf
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have no idea whether that is the issue or not, it just
> > > > > > > > seems unusual to me.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 2:11 PM Sudhakar Kakaraparthi <
> > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Looks like there is an issue images, here are the details
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for resolving my previous issue with Crux and
> > mx:
> > > > > > > > components.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Now I am getting following error while replacing Flex
> > > > > > > > > remote object with Royale. Here is my pseudo code,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Remote object definition
> > > > > > > > > <mx:RemoteObject id="testService"
> > destination="TestController"
> > > > > > > > > fault="onFault(event)"
> > > > > > > > >     endpoint="
> > > http://localhost:8082/sample-app/messagebroker/amf
> > > > "
> > > > > > > > > requestTimeout="240" />
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Channel definition
> > > > > > > > > <channel-definition id="my-amf"
> > > > > > > class="mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel">
> > > > > > > > >             <endpoint url="http://{server.name
> > > > > > > > > }:{server.port}/{context.root}/messagebroker/amf.txt"
> > > > > > > > >
> >  class="flex.messaging.endpoints.AMFEndpoint"/>
> > > > > > > > >         </channel-definition>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Error message
> > > > > > > > > rootCause:
> > > > > > > > >                 code: -1004
> > > > > > > > >                 data: null
> > > > > > > > >                 detail: "Invalid XMLHttpRequest response
> > > > > > > > > status or
> > > > > > > type."
> > > > > > > > >                 message: "Invalid response type."
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As I see all remote object examples are based on
> > > > > > > > > websocket-amf, I am not sure if Royale remote object
> > > > > > > > > supports amf and secure-amf
> > > > > > channels.
> > > > > > > > > Please advise.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Sudhakar.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > From: Sudhakar Kakaraparthi
> > > > > > > > > [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, October 05, 2020 9:04 PM
> > > > > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > > > > Subject: RemoteObject error - Invalid Response type
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for resolving my previous issue with Crux and
> > mx:
> > > > > > > > components.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Now I am getting following error while replacing Flex
> > > > > > > > > remote object with Royale. Here is my pseudo code,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Remote object definition
> > > > > > > > > [cid:[email protected]]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Channel definition
> > > > > > > > > [cid:[email protected]]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Error message
> > > > > > > > > [cid:[email protected]]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > As I see all remote object examples are based on
> > > > > > > > > websocket-amf, I am not sure if Royale remote object
> > > > > > > > > supports amf and secure-amf
> > > > > > channels.
> > > > > > > > > Please advise.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Sudhakar.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > This communication may contain confidential and/or
> > > > > > > > > privileged
> > > > > > > > information.
> > > > > > > > > If you are not the intended recipient (or have received
> > > > > > > > > this communication in error) please notify the sender
> > > > > > > > > immediately and destroy this communication. Any
> > > > > > > > > unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the
> > > > > > > > > material in this communication is strictly
> > > > > > > forbidden.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please refer to https://db.com/disclosures for additional
> > > > > > > > > EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Deutsche Bank does not render legal or tax advice, and the
> > > > > > > > > information contained in this communication should not be
> > > > > > > > > regarded
> > > > > > as such.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > This communication may contain confidential and/or
> > > > > > > > > privileged
> > > > > > > > information.
> > > > > > > > > If you are not the intended recipient (or have received
> > > > > > > > > this communication in error) please notify the sender
> > > > > > > > > immediately and destroy this communication. Any
> > > > > > > > > unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the
> > > > > > > > > material in this communication is strictly
> > > > > > > forbidden.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please refer to https://db.com/disclosures for additional
> > > > > > > > > EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Deutsche Bank does not render legal or tax advice, and the
> > > > > > > > > information contained in this communication should not be
> > > > > > > > > regarded
> > > > > > as such.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > This communication may contain confidential and/or
> > > > > > > > privileged
> > > > > > > information.
> > > > > > > > If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this
> > > > > > > communication
> > > > > > > > in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy
> > > > > > > > this communication. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or
> > > > > > > > distribution of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > material in this communication is strictly forbidden.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please refer to https://db.com/disclosures for additional EU
> > > > > > > > corporate and regulatory disclosures.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Deutsche Bank does not render legal or tax advice, and the
> > > > > > > > information contained in this communication should not be
> > > > > > > > regarded as
> > > > > > such.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged
> > > > > information.
> > > > > > If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this
> > > > > communication
> > > > > > in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
> > > > > > communication. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or
> > > > > > distribution of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > material in this communication is strictly forbidden.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please refer to https://db.com/disclosures for additional EU
> > > > > > corporate and regulatory disclosures.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Deutsche Bank does not render legal or tax advice, and the
> > > > > > information contained in this communication should not be
> > > > > > regarded as
> > > > such.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged
> > > information.
> > > > If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this
> > > communication
> > > > in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
> > > > communication. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution
> > > > of
> > > the
> > > > material in this communication is strictly forbidden.
> > > >
> > > > Please refer to https://db.com/disclosures for additional EU
> > > > corporate and regulatory disclosures.
> > > >
> > > > Deutsche Bank does not render legal or tax advice, and the
> > > > information contained in this communication should not be regarded as
> > such.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> > *Apache Software Foundation*
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
> > ---
> > This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information.
> > If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this
> communication
> > in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this
> > communication. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of
> the
> > material in this communication is strictly forbidden.
> >
> > Please refer to https://db.com/disclosures for additional EU corporate
> > and regulatory disclosures.
> >
> > Deutsche Bank does not render legal or tax advice, and the information
> > contained in this communication should not be regarded as such.
> >
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
*Apache Software Foundation*
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Reply via email to