Hi Guys,
Instead creating new subject I decided report here something which does
apply to the problem. In Prominics's MyAccount [1] which is mostly Jewel
oriented we are doing a lot of following applies:
.stackedShrinkFormItem {
IBeadLayout:
ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.layouts.VerticalLayout");
}
<j:FormItem className="stackedShrinkFormItem" />
Above working perfectly with Jewel type of application. Unfortunately when
I do above applies of bead in Emulation oriented application for Spark or
Mx components class is being applied to item, but everything else is
ignored. Bead is not being applied ? Could it be compiler issue ?
Thanks,
Piotr
[1] https://prominic.net/MyAccount
śr., 25 gru 2019 o 11:11 Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> napisał(a):
> I think working on that extension would be appreciated and used, since most
> of users will use it without doubt
>
> El mié., 25 dic. 2019 a las 0:45, Alex Harui (<aha...@adobe.com.invalid>)
> escribió:
>
> > I don't see why you couldn't create a CSSValuesImpl that supports
> > descendant selectors. Hopefully IValuesImpls are easily replaceable.
> >
> > HTH,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 12/24/19, 6:36 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Taking a look at SimpleCSSValuesImpl, the documentation says it
> > doesn’t handle descendants. So it looks to me like that rules out all
> > proposals except Carlos’. I’ll probably just inject the bead in the mxml.
> > Thanks, all.
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID>
> > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 5:37:26 PM
> > To: dev@royale.apache.org <dev@royale.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Smart Selectors for Beads
> >
> > If the objects can all subclass a base class then you can use one of
> > our fake type selectors.
> >
> > Alternatively, and I don't think we've tried this, but all interested
> > classes could load a bead that injects an additional classname/typename
> and
> > then the descendant CSS can use that instead of .datechooser.
> >
> > That said, it isn't clear to me why your descendant selector didn't
> > work so there might be a bug there. I don't know if SimpleCSSValuesImpl
> > handles descendant selectors. Cuz it is 'Simple'
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 12/23/19, 7:22 AM, "Yishay Weiss" <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I need to add a bead to all Table objects in our application, but
> > not to Table objects contained within another specific css class. So in
> our
> > css I’ve defined
> >
> > j|Table {
> > IBeadView: ClassReference("classes.beads.GridLikeTableView");
> > }
> >
> > But now I find that tables in a calendar are also affected, which
> > is unintended. So I tried adding before that
> >
> > .datechooser j|Table {
> > IBeadView:
> > ClassReference("org.apache.royale.jewel.beads.views.TableView");
> > }
> >
> > But that affects all Table objects whether or not they’re
> > contained in a .datachooser class. Any ideas how to be more surgical
> about
> > adding beads?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Piotr Zarzycki
