Hi Chris,
this commit: "- Updated the config.xmls to refer to the SWCs with the
updated Ant-names"
(sha: 70a06fb43714ddc937b985b44595e297b5cd6376)
has the changes I refer. There's some changes in pom.xml examples, but I
think since are poms and not distribution are ok
El dom, 28 feb 2021 a las 21:10, Christofer Dutz (<christofer.d...@c-ware.de>)
escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> I can't even recall having changed anything in any of the pom.xml files.
> I'm currently working on the deistribution.
>
> Chris
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org>
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Februar 2021 20:19
> An: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> Betreff: About removing ${royale.framework.version} in pom.xml to refer to
> MXRoyale CSS in todomvc example
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> this change in pom.xml:
>
>
> -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyale-${royale.framework.version}-js.swc:defaults.css;
>
> to this:
>
> -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyaleJS.swc:defaults.css;
>
> is not working right.
>
> If I build todomvc-jewel-crux (for example) with the later, I get MXRoyale
> styles mixed in the example.
>
> For example the main title gets bigger and bolder.
>
> If I return to the older, it works ok.
>
> I'm building with Maven, so it seems ok to left as before, while in
> asconfigc, I think it will be ok not having version in the name since SDK
> doesn't have
>
> make that sense?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
> *Apache Software Foundation*
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
--
Carlos Rovira
Apache Member & Apache Royale PMC
*Apache Software Foundation*
http://about.me/carlosrovira
