I have not explained myself well... forgive me because I translate with the deepltranslate ☹. I did a whole battery of tests with the DataGrid, VirtualDataGrid, ComoboBox, VirtualComboBox, List and VirtualList. Indeed with the "Virtual" there is no problem with the number of records but "at that time", when I tested them, there were other added problems that prevented me from using them. I also recognize you that "I have learned something in almost two years working with Royale-Jewel" and, perhaps, if I would try it again now.... 😝
Hiedra. -----Mensaje original----- De: Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com> Enviado el: lunes, 22 de noviembre de 2021 11:51 Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org> Asunto: Re: New bead to allow Jewel DataGrid to have locked columns Maria, This is with the standard DataGrid. Try the VirtualDataGrid version (there is a visual issue with the scroll that we should address later) and you will see the difference. The size of the ArrayList does not matter anymore. Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> escreveu no dia segunda, 22/11/2021 à(s) 10:42: > Jajajjaj "1000 records and 70 columns"????????? the DataGrid??????? > Well, I must have done something very wrong, because for me 100 > registrations took me 6 seconds... 😝 > > > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Hugo Ferreira > <hferreira...@gmail.com<mailto:hferreira...@gmail.com>> > Enviado el: lunes, 22 de noviembre de 2021 11:04 > Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org<mailto: > dev@royale.apache.org>> > Asunto: Re: New bead to allow Jewel DataGrid to have locked columns > > > > The VirtualList exists and VirtualDataGrid also already exists: > > https://royale.apache.org/tourdejewel/#!virtual_lists_panel > > Before that, I also did a test and normal DataGrid it's not up to big data. > > Now you can use 1000 records and 70 column without pagination. > > > > Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com<mailto:mjest...@iest.com>> > escreveu no dia segunda, 22/11/2021 > > à(s) 09:58: > > > > > The VirtualDataGrid would be the best option because in the battery > > of > > > tests that I did the DataGrid, with 7 columns and 100 records took a > > > long time to render. This also happens with the Jewel List, to > > > minimize the impact I paginated the results and so everything works > > as > expected. > > > > > > DevExpress DataGrid has a good front-end, I have not worked with it, > > > but from my experience with other JS components (Virtual-Select or > > the > > > Inspire-Tree) it is usually complicated to customize the renderers, > > > although I am convinced that with extensive knowledge in JS this > > could > > > be saved. > > > > > > Thanks for sharing your work Hugo. > > > If I can help you with the examples let me know. > > > > > > Hiedra. > > > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > > De: Hugo Ferreira > > <hferreira...@gmail.com<mailto:hferreira...@gmail.com>> > Enviado el: lunes, 22 de > > > noviembre de 2021 10:41 > > > Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org<mailto: > dev@royale.apache.org>> > > > Asunto: Re: New bead to allow Jewel DataGrid to have locked columns > > > > > > Hi Hiedra, > > > > > > Yes, a DataGrid is always the most complex and features demanding on > > > any "layout language". > > > As we came from Flex to Royale we are specially demanding on these > > > little but important features. > > > When I first seriously tested Royale, it was with Jewel and DataGrid > > > seems to be basic. > > > Since then it has grown with the VirtualDataGrid variant (we still > > > have a scrollbar bar visibility issue but I will try to fix when I > > > will use it) and now a few new beads this weekend. > > > My DataGrid also is hardcoded with code for an easier edit mode that > > I > > > hope to delegate and commit as a bead. > > > > > > I don't see how to replace a DataGrid that requires editing with a > > > simple List. > > > > > > On the other hand, I saw recently here in the mailing list a > > > possibility (in progress) to use DevExpress DataGrid and seems a > > > fantastic advanced DataGrid. > > > I just don't know if it is easier to implement item renderer with > > > Royale components that we can control. Let's find out later. > > > > > > I didn't thought about TDJ examples. > > > I will try to find time to do that. > > > > > > Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com<mailto:mjest...@iest.com>> > escreveu no dia segunda, > > > 22/11/2021 > > > à(s) 09:18: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I don't use Jewel DataGrid, I use Jewel List because until not > > > long > > > > ago the DataGrid didn't work as I required. Do you plan to set up > > > > some example in TDJ of all these modifications? > > > > > > > > Thx. > > > > Hiedra > > > > > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > > > De: Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com<mailto: > hferreira...@gmail.com>> Enviado el: domingo, 21 > > > > de noviembre de 2021 12:08 > > > > Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org<mailto: > dev@royale.apache.org>> > > > > Asunto: New bead to allow Jewel DataGrid to have locked columns > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I just commited a new bead to Jewel DataGrid, to work similar to > > > > lockedColumnCount property of Flex DataGrid. > > > > This new bead was tested in combination with the recent bead to > > > lock > > > > the entire header (when it is inside of a group with scroll), so > > > we > > > > can have a full floating grid with the entire locked header on top > > > > and a portion of columns (and header) fixed on the left side. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Hugo. > > > > > > > >
