Further to your comments, Harbs:
Crux (or anything else of substance, probably) won't work in release mode
runtime-loaded 'modules', if that is the reference to 'modules'. They only
work in debug mode, and I think there are still issues in debug mode with
some things.
Otherwise I think it might be maven 'modules' that Maria is referring to,
which would correspond to making local dependencies (e.g. the local swcs).
Josh:
That is a good suggestion/observation. I typically have these types of
settings defined in a higher level pom so they get shared/inherited across
the various 'modules' for swcs and the app(s). I tend to use a maven
property definition e.g. "royale.config" which can be concatenated with any
local (lower level pom) settings .
<additionalCompilerOptions>
${royale.config}
...local settings
</additionalCompilerOptions>
On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 7:05 AM Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> > for example the "MasterConfigSystemModel" is inside the library in the
> module "royaleconfigsystem") that are compiled with these options:
> > <additionalCompilerOptions>
> > -js-default-initializers=true;
> > -source-map=true;
> > -source-map-source-root=${project.basedir}/src/main/royale/;
> > </additionalCompilerOptions>
>
> I see that you use -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true in your
> application's additionalCompilerOptions, but not in your library's. You
> should try adding it to your library too. If you have multiple libraries,
> it may be worth trying to add it to all of them.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:14 AM Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the explanation Harb, I really didn't understand the term
> > Reflection in this context.
> > I understand that with " The default compiler options should work with
> > Crux and Reflection. Can you test that?" you mean to remove all
> additional
> > compiler options?
> >
> > I have left only these options:
> >
> > <additionalCompilerOptions>
> > -js-default-initializers=true;
> > -source-map=true;
> > -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true
> >
> >
> -keep-as3-metadata+=Inject,Dispatcher,EventHandler,Event,PostConstruct,PreDestroy,ViewAdded,ViewRemoved,Bindable,Transient;
> > -keep-code-with-metadata=Inject;
> > -show-binding-warnings=false;
> > </additionalCompilerOptions>
> >
> > With these options it has not worked either, but the message has changed
> a
> > little:
> >
> > An exception occurred: ReferenceError: Error #1065: Variable
> > com.iest.winplusweb.models.MasterConfigSystemModel is not defined.
> > at aR (http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:4280:1727)
> > at Function.I$.getMetadataHost (
> > http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:6262:45)
> > at H9.getMetadataHost (
> > http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:6666:147)
> > at H9.getMetadataHosts (
> > http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:6665:299)
> > at H9.fromTypeDefinition (
> > http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:6666:381)
> > at Function.HT.getTypeDescriptor (
> > http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:5445:880)
> > at Function.WW.constructBean (
> > http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:2723:296)
> > at n$.initializeBeans (
> > http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:5962:1046)
> > at n$.initialize (http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:5962:915
> )
> > at EW.constructProviders (
> > http://localhost:8080/WPWebRelease/App.js:1149:254)
> >
> > These options are the ones I use in the pom of the application (views)
> but
> > I have a library with independent modules (the models, controllers,
> > services, components, ... for example the "MasterConfigSystemModel" is
> > inside the library in the module "royaleconfigsystem") that are compiled
> > with these options:
> >
> > <additionalCompilerOptions>
> > -js-default-initializers=true;
> > -source-map=true;
> > -source-map-source-root=${project.basedir}/src/main/royale/;
> > </additionalCompilerOptions>
> >
> > I don't identify any problematic options.... how do you see it?
> >
> > Now I'm going to pull from the crux thread... I will study how are the
> > pom's of the SDK examples, compile and test in realease mode.
> > Thank you very much Harb. I'll keep posting my progress in case it can
> > help someone else.
> >
> > Hiedra
> >
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> > Enviado el: martes, 14 de diciembre de 2021 14:05
> > Para: dev@royale.apache.org
> > Asunto: Re: Differences between bebug and release
> >
> > My guess is you are using Crux. Correct?
> >
> > As I understand it Crux relies heavily on Reflection. Reflection is used
> > to examine your classes at runtime. Part of the minification process can
> > rename public pieces of your classes. When that happens, some information
> > is lost. As long as the references are preserved everything works.
> > Reflection relies on getting information about classes from strings when
> > those strings are renamed, the reflection classes will not be able to
> find
> > thew correct classes.
> >
> > The default compiler options should work with Crux and Reflection. Can
> you
> > test that?
> >
> > I’m not sure exactly which names are needed for Reflection, so I can’t
> > give you a more precise answer on which options you can safely add.
> >
> > > On Dec 14, 2021, at 1:54 PM, Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> ..., This means that you can’t rename them without breaking things.
> > >
> > > Hahahahaha, you've made me a lot calmer.... hahahahahaha
> > >
> > >> Which rename options do you still have? One of them is causing your
> > class paths to be lost.
> > >
> > > I really don't know what you mean :( The only thing I know is that I
> > need the dependency to the Reflexion artifact and I have it specified in
> > the pom :P where can I find this information?
> > > I will change everything that needs to be changed...
> > >
> > > Hiedra
> > >
> > > -----Mensaje original-----
> > > De: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> > > Enviado el: martes, 14 de diciembre de 2021 12:24
> > > Para: dev@royale.apache.org
> > > Asunto: Re: Differences between bebug and release
> > >
> > > We really need a documentation page which explains the minification
> > options and its effects.
> > >
> > > In your specific case, you are using Reflection. Reflection relies on
> > the public names in classes, This means that you can’t rename them
> without
> > breaking things. Use of Reflection greatly limits which minification
> > options you can use.
> > >
> > > Which rename options do you still have? One of them is causing your
> > class paths to be lost.
> > >
> > > Harbs
> > >
> > >> On Dec 14, 2021, at 1:17 PM, Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I have removed the 3 compiler options and the initial errors with XML
> > >> now do not occur, however, I still get an error in the model [1]
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> > >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gFr4JtsfFRPKo8uQdZ-W64RmofsrJwfc/vie
> > >> w
> > >> ?usp=sharing
> > >>
> > >> I would love to "understand" all this, I'm sure it would bother you a
> > lot less... excuse me, but I have no idea where to go from here...
> > >>
> > >> Hiedra.
> > >>
> > >> -----Mensaje original-----
> > >> De: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> > >> Enviado el: martes, 14 de diciembre de 2021 11:20
> > >> Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> > >> Asunto: Re: Differences between bebug and release
> > >>
> > >> Actually, you can probably keep -export-public-symbols=false, but
> > >> remove -prevent-rename-public-static-methods=false and/or
> > >> -prevent-rename-public-instance-methods=false
> > >>
> > >>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 12:18 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Try removing -export-public-symbols=false
> > >>>
> > >>> You might also need to remove
> > >>> -prevent-rename-public-static-methods=false and/or
> > >>> -prevent-rename-public-instance-methods=false
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 12:12 PM, Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I compile with Maven:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> <additionalCompilerOptions>
> > >>>> -js-default-initializers=true;
> > >>>> -source-map=true;
> > >>>> -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true <!-- to
> > access JSON object graph subobjects -->
> > >>>>
> >
> -keep-as3-metadata+=Inject,Dispatcher,EventHandler,Event,PostConstruct,PreDestroy,ViewAdded,ViewRemoved,Bindable,Transient;
> > >>>> -keep-code-with-metadata=Inject;
> > >>>> -show-binding-warnings=false;
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -export-public-symbols=false
> > >>>> -prevent-rename-protected-symbols=false
> > >>>> -prevent-rename-internal-symbols=false
> > >>>> -prevent-rename-public-static-methods=false
> > >>>> -prevent-rename-public-instance-methods=false
> > >>>> </additionalCompilerOptions>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> As you will see I use some of the new options Josh introduced to
> > reduce the output size... I have read your conversation about it, but I
> > haven't modified anything because the option that seems to give problems
> I
> > don't have .
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I am modifying the recovery, as suggested by Greg (via
> xmlData['xxx']
> > instead of xmlData.child('xxxx') and this seems to fix it BUT I want to
> > know why and if I can avoid it because until not long ago this worked
> fine
> > in release.
> > >>>> As soon as I have verified it works I will go back and test by
> > >>>> removing each of the compiler options to see if they are
> interfering.
> > >>>> Any suggestions? :P
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hiedra
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -----Mensaje original-----
> > >>>> De: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> Enviado el: martes, 14 de diciembre de 2021 10:54
> > >>>> Para: dev@royale.apache.org
> > >>>> Asunto: Re: Differences between bebug and release
> > >>>>
> > >>>> What is the full list of compiler options you are using?
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:46 AM, Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The option -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true I have it, I
> will
> > check the rest you tell me....
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thx.
> > >>>>> Hiedra
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -----Mensaje original-----
> > >>>>> De: Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> Enviado el: martes, 14 de
> > >>>>> diciembre de 2021 9:36
> > >>>>> Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> > >>>>> Asunto: Re: Differences between bebug and release
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> It's not obvious when you encounter these issues.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I would probably try:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> new XML (e.target['data']);
> > >>>>> just in case that is being renamed.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> or perhaps the -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true that Harbs
> > and others have mentioned.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> If that doesn't work I would try something like:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> var xmlData:XML = new XML (e.target.data); COMPILE::JS{
> > >>>>> console.log('js-release check of xml:', xmlData); }
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> to see in the js console what an XML instance looks like in release
> > mode.
> > >>>>> If there is no 'child' method on that, then I think there is some
> > other problem there.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:17 PM Maria Jose Esteve <
> mjest...@iest.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hello,
> > >>>>>> I had not come back to this error...
> > >>>>>> Yes Greg, just one, with which I load the backend
> configuration....
> > >>>>>> On line 40 ...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> private function loadXML(e:Event):void{
> > >>>>>> var xmlData:XML = new XML (e.target.data);
> > >>>>>> /* Procesar datos del XML */
> > >>>>>> servicesConfig.WPWebService.source =
> > >>>>>> xmlData.child("source").toString(); <-- Line 40
> > >>>>>> servicesConfig.loginChannel.channelId =
> > >>>>>> xmlData.child("channelId").toString();
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The fact is that this is in the application, almost from the
> > >>>>>> beginning and had not given me any errors previously when running
> > the release version.
> > >>>>>> Could you explain a bit more? Maybe for you it's obvious but I
> > >>>>>> don't see it :P
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thx.
> > >>>>>> Hiedra
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -----Mensaje original-----
> > >>>>>> De: Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> Enviado el: martes, 14 de
> > >>>>>> diciembre de 2021 2:05
> > >>>>>> Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
> > >>>>>> Asunto: Re: Differences between bebug and release
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi Maria,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Do you use any XML in your app?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> And/or what code is line 40 in your App.mxml ? Is it an event
> > >>>>>> handler for a service call?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 4:11 AM Maria Jose Esteve
> > >>>>>> <mjest...@iest.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> As I mentioned in another post, my release version doesn't work
> > >>>>>>> either (a few months ago I did a test deployment and it worked,
> > >>>>>>> with less code of course). In my case I get this error:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> App.mxml:40 Uncaught TypeError: a.child is not a function
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> at $$.J.Zwa (App.mxml:40)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> at B4.J.HA (EventDispatcher.as:131)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> at Jxa (eventtarget.js:381)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> at B4.J.dispatchEvent (EventDispatcher.as:108)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> at B4.J.nLa (URLLoader.as:367)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> My build is maven, different from Hugo's, but could the errors
> > >>>>>>> be
> > >>>>>> related?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> @Harbs, could this be related to the comments made lately when
> > minifying?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I can tell this is all hyper-mega-new to me? 😝
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hiedra
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> -----Mensaje original-----
> > >>>>>>> De: Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> Enviado el: viernes, 10 de
> > >>>>>>> diciembre de 2021 14:05
> > >>>>>>> Para: dev@royale.apache.org
> > >>>>>>> Asunto: Re: Differences between bebug and release
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> You can try setting -js-dynamic-access-unknown-members=true
> > >>>>>>> although normally it shouldn’t be necessary with the current
> > defaults.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/compiler/compiler-options.h
> > >>>>>>> t
> > >>>>>>> m
> > >>>>>>> l#
> > >>>>>>> js
> > >>>>>>> -dynamic-access-unknown-members
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Dec 10, 2021, at 2:43 PM, Hugo Ferreira
> > >>>>>>>> <hferreira...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>> <mailto:hferreira...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I only see an error in console that does not seems related:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> telemetryproxy.html:1 Failed to load resource: the server
> > >>>>>>>> responded
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> with a status of 404 ()
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> What's the option to build in release without minify to check
> > >>>>>>>> if that
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> is really the case?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
> > >>>>>>>> escreveu no
> > >>>>>>> dia sexta, 10/12/2021 à(s) 09:08:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I meant in your browser. Is there an error in the browser
> > console?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 10, 2021, at 3:17 AM, Hugo Ferreira
> > >>>>>>>>>> <hferreira...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>> <mailto:hferreira...@gmail.com>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> This is the full log from my dev tool (Visual Studio Code):
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Executing task: /usr/bin/java -jar
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> /Users/hugo/.vscode/extensions/bowlerhatllc.vscode-as3mxml-1.10.
> > >>>>>>>>> 0
> > >>>>>>>>> /b
> > >>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> /asconfigc.jar
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --sdk /Volumes/Data/SDK/apache-royale-src/apache-royale
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --debug=false --project
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> /Volumes/Data/CloudDrive/Projects/GC/AddIn/asconfig.json <
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> MXMLJSC
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> +royalelib=/Volumes/Data/SDK/apache-royale-src/apache-royale/
> > >>>>>>>>>> +f
> > >>>>>>>>>> +r
> > >>>>>>>>>> +a
> > >>>>>>>>>> +me
> > >>>>>>>>>> +wo
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> +rks
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --debug=false
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> +configname=royale
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --targets=JSRoyale
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --source-map=true
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --html-template=src/resources/jewel-example-index-template.ht
> > >>>>>>>>>> m
> > >>>>>>>>>> l
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --theme=${royalelib}/themes/Jewel-Light-NoFlat-Primary-Blue-Th
> > >>>>>>>>> e
> > >>>>>>>>> m
> > >>>>>>>>> e
> > >>>>>>>>> /s
> > >>>>>>>>> rc
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> /main/resources/defaults.css
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --js-library-path+=${royalelib}/js/libs/MXRoyaleJS.swc
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> -remove-circulars
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> -js-output-optimization=skipAsCoercions
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > -compiler.exclude-defaults-css-files=MXRoyale-0.9.9-js.swc:defaults.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> css
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> -keep-as3-metadata+=Transient
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> src/App.mxml
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Dec 10, 2021 1:14:43 AM
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> com.google.javascript.jscomp.LoggerErrorManager
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> printSummary
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> INFO: 0 error(s), 0 warning(s), 98.0% typed The project 'App'
> > >>>>>>>>>> has
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> been successfully compiled and optimized.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> 44.034354896 seconds
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Terminal will be reused by tasks, press any key to close it.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> No errors.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> No warning.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> But custom itemerrors not appear and a few features do not
> show.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Building in debug mode and all works perfectly.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> escreveu
> > >>>>>>> no dia quinta, 9/12/2021 à(s)
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> 00:05:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Differences in release mode is generally because of renaming
> > >>>>>>>>>>> when
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> minifying. Do you get an error in the dev tools?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Make sure you’re using typedefs correctly for external APIs.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Harbs
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 9, 2021, at 1:52 AM, Hugo Ferreira
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <hferreira...@gmail.com
> > >>>>>>> <mailto:hferreira...@gmail.com>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I just finished my first Royale Add-In application that was
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> tested
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> only
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> in
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> debug mode.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Now I compiled in release mode and when I was testing I saw
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> that
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> custom item renderers did not appear.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Probably this is not merged to the App.js single file ?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
