I’ll try to create placeholder classes to subclass them. > Might be simpler to just special case these two.
How would we go about that? > On Dec 25, 2021, at 6:08 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > Hmm. That may not work since you can't extend a static function. Might be > simpler to just special case these two. > > -Alex > > On 12/25/21, 12:08 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > I took a look. It does require an "extends" relationship to force the > goog.require for something in GCL.swc. I don't think we want to change that, > so try a workaround. > > On 12/20/21, 9:02 AM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > I will try to look at it this coming weekend. One thing to try for > now is to create a class that extends goog.html.SafeHtml and redirect > sanitization through the subclass. Maybe the only way to get the dependency > is to have an 'extends' relationship on the dependency, since that's what > EventDispatcher does. > > -Alex > > On 12/20/21, 7:16 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Dec 20, 2021, at 10:20 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >> I might have time this weekend to spend more time getting it to work, but >> the idea is that you add to GCL.swc the .as version of whatever JS file you >> need from Google Closure Library > > Check. > >> , make sure the subset code in downloads.xml doesn't delete it, > > Check. > >> and then if the transpiled output of, say, Label references >> goog.html.SafeHtml, it should show up in the addDependency line for Label. > > > Here’s where I’m stuck. > > That’s what I was expecting, but it doesn’t. I don’t know if it’s > because it’s a utility function rather than a class or some other reason, but > goog.html.SafeHtml and friends do not appear as dependencies. > > >
