Thanks Josh, it's what I assumed as well. I have meant to ask this in the past, because I have pondered it on many occasions. I see both the ant and maven builds creating swf-swcs that include the js output. Unless my build setup is doing something different to everyone else...
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 11:13 AM Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> wrote: > As I understand it, SWF-only .swc files should not contain any .js files. > > -- > Josh Tynjala > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 2:06 PM Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We have swf-swcs and js-swcs. Maven puts them alongside eachother, ant > puts > > them in the two separate folders (swf in the original project folder, js > > inside corresponding projectJS folder in the sibling file structure). > > > > Question: > > Why do the swf-swc builds have js out content inside them? I think that > in > > quite a few cases the 'swf' representation (which contains the > definitions > > loaded by the compiler) of the js in the js build is probably a little > > different to the 'swf' representation inside the swf build because there > > can be api differences between js and swf (via COMPILE::SWF and > > COMPILE::JS differences etc). So I assume that it is not the general > case > > that we would have a unified swc. If so, why does the swf-only swc build > > contain js files? > > >
