Well, I don’t know why the gpg check is failing for me. I’ll wait until someone 
else checks the release. If it works for others, I’ll assume it’s a problem 
locally for me and see if I can fix it...

> On Mar 9, 2022, at 1:13 PM, Yishay Weiss <yishayj...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> No, that’s the one
> 
> From: Harbs<mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com <mailto:harbs.li...@gmail.com>>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 12:48 PM
> To: Apache Royale Development<mailto:dev@royale.apache.org 
> <mailto:dev@royale.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC2
> 
> I seem to have your key from April 13, 2020. That seems to be the most 
> current published key.
> 
> Did you use a newer one?
> 
>> On Mar 9, 2022, at 12:43 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I got an error here:
>> 
>> check-sigs:
>> 
>> gpg_check:
>> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar  8 08:59:15 2022 IST
>> gpg:                using RSA key F4CE36E979325A6221706DB0E86EF353F54FE093
>> gpg: key E86EF353F54FE093: new key but contains no user ID - skipped
>> gpg: Total number processed: 1
>> gpg:           w/o user IDs: 1
>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>> 
>> Did you not publish your key, or do I need to import it?
>> 
>>> On Mar 8, 2022, at 10:28 AM, apacheroyal...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:apacheroyal...@gmail.com> <mailto:apacheroyal...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:apacheroyal...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yishay Weiss

Reply via email to