Thanks for verifying.

Please log it here:
https://github.com/apache/royale-asjs/issues

It may well require a combination of compiler fix and/or framework (binding
classes) fix. But having a simple repro example will make it much easier to
figure that out.

Cheers,
Greg


On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 12:43 PM Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> You are absolutely right !
> It worked !
> Thank you very much.
>
> Where should I log this bug ?
>
> Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia terça, 29/03/2022 à(s)
> 00:36:
>
> > For:
> > modelType="{TestGridModel}"
> >
> > it is not 'modelType' that needs to be [Bindable] in this case as it is
> the
> > destination of the binding, not the source of it.
> >
> > Assuming other bindings are working in the enclosing mxml file (which
> > should be true with ContainerDataBinding), then perhaps there is an issue
> > with the 'const'-like assignment of a class directly in this case. You
> > could perhaps try doing something like this:
> >
> > public class TestConfig {
> >
> >   public static const gridModel:Class = TestGridModel;
> >
> > }
> >
> > and
> > modelType="{ TestConfig.gridModel }"
> >
> > to see if that works. If changing it like that does work, then please
> log a
> > bug for the original version of this that is not working,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 12:09 PM Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have the following mxml code:
> > >
> > > <dg:DataGrid localId="grid"
> > > dataProvider="{data}"
> > > width="100%"
> > > height="200">
> > > <dg:beads>
> > > <beads:DataGridOptions modelType="{TestGridModel}"/>
> > > </dg:beads>
> > > ...
> > >
> > > The DataGridOptions bead it's a bead to dynamically add buttons on the
> > > Jewel DataGrid footer.
> > > This bead have a property called modelType:Class and the data binding
> is
> > > not working (the property is always null)
> > >
> > > I have the ContainerDataBinding set on the main mxml file.
> > > I also tried to decorate the modelType property with [Bindable]
> > >
> > > Do I missing a special DataBinding bead for this ?
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to