In regards to playerglobal, version 32.0 is still available from this page, if we still want to point out where users can download the official Adobe version.
https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/debug_downloads.html -- Josh Tynjala Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 4:57 PM Greg Dove <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just a couple of notes from me: > > Future improvements in README > --------------------------------------------- > > playerglobal > I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The > links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for > download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own > playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention > that, or the section removed from README (as something that is > special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external > dependency. > > Air > Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about > Harman). Should this section be updated? > > > Test of TourDeJewel > --------------------------- > There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven: > While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some > runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top > left). > Error logging observed in js dev console: > Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu > option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just > noting it for attention... > > > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> > wrote: > > > Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I > > mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even > > without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build. > However, > > it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just got unlucky > > when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently affect the > JS-only > > SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the JS+SWF SDK just as > frequently > > on the same machine. > > > > Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the > > release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build, and > if > > the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I plan to > vote > > +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere all > > look good too. > > > > -- > > Josh Tynjala > > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > This is the discussion thread. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Yishay Weiss > > >
