Yes. That’ll likely work.
> On Jun 8, 2022, at 12:34 AM, Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I create the full path on my project
> org.apache.royale.html.util.getLabelFromData
> with the custom code and seems to override the SDK.
>
> Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia terça, 7/06/2022
> à(s) 22:16:
>
>> I use itemRenders for more visual complex things (images, text with bold,
>> etc ...)
>> On this case I have a generic itemRender (visual aspect) and what's
>> different it's the content.
>> Doing an itemRender for each ComboBox seems to much work and a simple
>> formula it's something in between for a less complex code structure.
>>
>> But I understand what you mean, that's why I asked in the first place
>> before commit.
>>
>> So, what's the best option to have this implemented only on my side (if
>> there is this option) ?
>> I would like to have this behaviour without put on the SDK and without
>> using itemRenderers.
>> For another word, how to have a copy of the custom getLabelFromData and
>> use this instead of the SDK ?
>>
>>
>> Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia terça, 7/06/2022 à(s) 22:04:
>>
>>> Hard coding it into a function which is widely used by ItemRenderers does
>>> not seem like a good idea or very PAYG.
>>>
>>> Id suggest creating ItemRenderers which have this behavior.
>>>
>>> If there’s some way to inject the behavior into existing functions that
>>> would be fine too, but I can’t think off hand of a good way of doing that.
>>>
>>>> On Jun 7, 2022, at 11:48 PM, Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Method getLabelFromData from getLabelFromData.as
>>>>
>>>> I just added a new if block that seek for "[" and thread the keys.
>>>> If it's OK, I can commit, otherwise I ask what's the best alternative
>>>> solution to achive the same result.
>>>>
>>>> public function getLabelFromData(obj:Object,data:Object):String
>>>> {
>>>> // slightly more code, but we bail early if it's a string which
>>> is
>>>> often
>>>> if (data is String) return "" + data;
>>>> if(!data) return "";
>>>> if(data is ILabeledData) return (data as ILabeledData).label;
>>>>
>>>> if (obj is IHasLabelField &&
>>>> (obj as IHasLabelField).labelField &&
>>>> (obj as IHasLabelField).labelField.indexOf("[") > -1)
>>>> {
>>>> var result:String = (obj as IHasLabelField).labelField;
>>>> for each (var item:String in result.split("["))
>>>> {
>>>> if (item.indexOf("]") > -1)
>>>> {
>>>> var field:String = item.split("]")[0];
>>>> result = result.replace("[" + field + "]",
>>> data[field]);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>> return result;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> if (obj is IHasLabelField &&
>>>> (obj as IHasLabelField).labelField &&
>>>> data[(obj as IHasLabelField).labelField] != null)
>>>> {
>>>> return "" + data[(obj as IHasLabelField).labelField];
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> if (obj is IHasDataField &&
>>>> (obj as IHasDataField).dataField &&
>>>> data[(obj as IHasDataField).dataField] != null)
>>>> {
>>>> return "" + data[(obj as IHasDataField).dataField];
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> var label:String = data["label"];
>>>> if(label != null){
>>>> return label;
>>>> }
>>>> return "" + data;
>>>>
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Maria Jose Esteve <mjest...@iest.com> escreveu no dia terça, 7/06/2022
>>> à(s)
>>>> 21:44:
>>>>
>>>>> Hugo, could it be seen? Maybe a branch or a PR?
>>>>>
>>>>> Hiedra
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Mensaje original-----
>>>>> De: Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Enviado el: martes, 7 de junio de 2022 21:58
>>>>> Para: Apache Royale Development <dev@royale.apache.org>
>>>>> Asunto: Proposal for labelField with expression support
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> In Flex "world" one can use labelField and labelFunction.
>>>>> Here in Royale we have only labelField (at least I didn't see so far
>>>>> support for labelFunction), however I'm not a big fan of labelFunction
>>>>> anyway.
>>>>>
>>>>> I always wanted support for something in between of labelField and
>>>>> labelFunction (labelFunction with multiple fields and fixed strings)
>>> and I
>>>>> implement it on my side.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ex:
>>>>> model:
>>>>> public class User
>>>>> {
>>>>> public var Code:String;
>>>>> public var Name:String;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> With this model, one can use Code (user code) or Name but not the
>>> combined
>>>>> fields.
>>>>>
>>>>> With a little adition I can now do something like this:
>>> labelField="[Code]
>>>>> - [Name]" and at runtime every field delimited by [] it's replaced for
>>> his
>>>>> value, allowing multiple fields and complex expressions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can I commit this or there is a reason to not do so ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Hugo.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
