Thank you.

OK, after you build-release you run a script that does exactly that.

Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia quinta, 9/03/2023 à(s) 21:37:

> I have a bash script to stage my app that looks like this:
>
> version=$(cat $DIR/releases.json | jq '.version')
> version="${version%\"}"
> version="${version#\"}"
>
> build=$(node -e 'console.log(Date.now())')
> jq '.build = '$build releases.json > tmp.$$.json && mv tmp.$$.json
> releases.json
>
> sed -ie "s/MyApp.js/MyApp.js?{build_number}/g" bin/js-release/index.html
> sed -ie "s/{build_number}/$build/g" bin/js-release/index.html
> sed -ie "s/{version_number}/$version/g" bin/js-release/index.html
>
> releases.json has the version and the build number is updated by this
> script.
>
> The template html has this:
>
>                 <meta name="build" content="{build_number}">
>                 <meta name="version" content="{version_number}">
>                 <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
> href="${application}.css?{build_number}">
>
> The HTML file on the server has a very short TTL. The rest of the files
> have a much longer TTL. The build script busts the cache when it’s deployed.
>
> Change “MyApp” to the name of your app.
>
> HTH,
> Harbs
>
>
> > On Mar 9, 2023, at 10:43 PM, Hugo Ferreira <hferreira...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm releasing now updates more often and sometimes (many times), the
> > browser cache my App.js
> > In a quick google search I found a solution (more a workaround) =>
> >
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1011605/clear-the-cache-in-javascript
> > When I build - release with VS Code, it inject this line on my html
> > file:<script type="text/javascript" src="./App.js"></script>
> > So, I don't have control over it.
> >
> > What I would like to do is something like have a version flag of my App
> in
> > the asconfig.json and when I build - relase the compiler inject something
> > like:<script type="text/javascript" src="./App.js?v=1"></script>
> > <script type="text/javascript" src="./App.js?v=2"></script>
> > ...
> >
> > This is possible today ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hugo.
>
>

Reply via email to