Thanks Josh, Is that something you can see yourself working on?
Thanks, Harbs > On Mar 27, 2024, at 5:47 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> wrote: > > I don't think this has been discussed before. I don't believe that there is > any technical issue preventing it. I suspect that getters/setters just > never crossed my mind when I implemented abstract methods. > > -- > Josh Tynjala > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev> > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:19 AM Gabe Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just noticed that getters and setters cannot be abstract. >> >> I don’t remember if this was discussed before. Is there an issue with >> adding that functionality? >> >> Thanks, >> Harbs