Thanks Josh,

Is that something you can see yourself working on?

Thanks,
Harbs

> On Mar 27, 2024, at 5:47 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev> wrote:
> 
> I don't think this has been discussed before. I don't believe that there is
> any technical issue preventing it. I suspect that getters/setters just
> never crossed my mind when I implemented abstract methods.
> 
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:19 AM Gabe Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I just noticed that getters and setters cannot be abstract.
>> 
>> I don’t remember if this was discussed before. Is there an issue with
>> adding that functionality?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Harbs

Reply via email to