+1 (non-binding)

Verified sigs/checksums match for source release and maven artifacts.
Built with all tests on CentOS 7.3.1611 with Maven 3.3.9 and Oracle JDK
1.8.0_144 on a fresh repo.  Also built with -P geoindexing,benchmark.

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 1:27 PM, David Lotts <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache Rya
> (Incubating), version 3.2.11.
>
> The source zip, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/rya/rya-
> incubating-3.2.11-rc3/
>
>
> Ancillary artifacts such as poms, jars, wars. can be found here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacherya-1008/org/apache/rya/rya-project/3.2.11-incubating/
>
> The Git tag is rya-incubating-3.2.11-rc3
> The Git commit ID is afe522412fb74cbb4ab97e1b7a8d1c112be33773
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-rya.git;a=commit;h=
> afe522412fb74cbb4ab97e1b7a8d1c112be33773
>
>
> Checksums of rya-project-3.2.11-source-release.zip:
> MD5: 3968cfb695a5740cac6acb3c33b702ca
> SHA1: d601431c06d9adb3336c2913cc544bd9b43c0d7a
> SHA512: b6ae761aa42f80e1cb84bb645184e29e4436eaaaf66aa7249aa65b6adb38
> f3dfdd9a6f8b536eb0e2de88ac75cc2a0c8d97d85b4dd0ffef7f9407e05642110b3f
>
> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/dlotts.asc
>
> KEYS file available here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/rya/KEYS
>
> Issues that were closed/resolved for this release are here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
> ctId=12319020&version=12341279
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting Tuesday 2pm 9/26/2017
> and close at Friday 9/29/2017 2pm Eastern Time USA.
> Please download the release candidate and evaluate the necessary items
> including checking hashes, signatures, build from source, and test.  Then
> please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as rya-project-3.2.11
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because because...
>

Reply via email to