[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S2GRAPH-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15171374#comment-15171374
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on S2GRAPH-17:
---------------------------------------

Github user SteamShon commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-s2graph/pull/34#discussion_r54366860
  
    --- Diff: s2rest_play/test/benchmark/JsonBenchmarkSpec.scala ---
    @@ -4,43 +4,43 @@ import play.api.libs.json.JsNumber
     import play.api.test.{FakeApplication, PlaySpecification, WithApplication}
     import play.libs.Json
     
    -class JsonBenchmarkSpec extends BenchmarkCommon with PlaySpecification {
    -  "to json" should {
    -    implicit val app = FakeApplication()
    -
    -    "json benchmark" in new WithApplication(app) {
    +class JsonBenchmarkSpec extends BenchmarkCommon {
    +  "to json" >> {
    +    "json benchmark" >> {
     
           duration("map to json") {
    -        (0 to 100) foreach { n =>
    +        (0 to 10) foreach { n =>
    --- End diff --
    
    I don`t think number of test here is not important so reduced them


> Remove unnecessary abstraction layer, Storage.
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: S2GRAPH-17
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/S2GRAPH-17
>             Project: S2Graph
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: DOYUNG YOON
>            Assignee: DOYUNG YOON
>              Labels: client, refactoring
>   Original Estimate: 168h
>  Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> Currently Graph contains following components.
> Graph has storage and each storage have followings.
> # SerDe: serialize and deserialize IndexEdge/SnapshotEdge/Vertex into bytes.
> # MutationBuilder: convert IndexEdge/SnapshotEdge into RPC which is dependent 
> on storage backend. 
> # QueryBuilder: issue RPC for fetch on storage backend
> With these components, storage know how to actually store/fetch 
> IndexEdge/SnapshotEdge/Vertex to, from storage backend.
> In my opinion, storage layer is unnecessary since all graph instance does is 
> delegating into storage. I am suggesting to remove storage layer and use 
> different Graph class for different storage backend.
> So for example, change AsynchbaseStorage into AsynchbaseGraph.
> I want to discuss how our Graph Client should be on this issue and change it 
> according to discussion.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to