+1 I also agree with this. As it seems that S4 is not longer active, it will simplify things if we drop S4.
Cheers, Albert On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Nicolas Kourtellis <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > I agree with this. It is unfortunate, but since the S4 project has been > inactive / not so much used > (last release seems to have been in June 2013) and since newer and more > powerful DSPEs are > in play, I think it make sense to drop S4. > > Cheers, > > Nicolas > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales (JIRA) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Gianmarco De Francisci Morales created SAMOA-57: >> --------------------------------------------------- >> >> Summary: Drop support for S4 >> Key: SAMOA-57 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SAMOA-57 >> Project: SAMOA >> Issue Type: Task >> Components: SAMOA-S4 >> Reporter: Gianmarco De Francisci Morales >> >> >> S4 had been inactive for a while and with no sign of coming back to life. >> The codebase is obsolete by today's standards and even compiling S4 >> requires manual steps. >> >> I propose to drop support for S4 and remove the SAMOA-S4 module. >> >> This will simplify the codebase, reduce the number of dependencies, and >> possibly reduce technical debt. It will also allow to move towards higher >> level APIs for the streaming engines in the future. >> >> >> >> -- >> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA >> (v6.3.4#6332) >> > > > > -- > Nicolas Kourtellis
