> On April 12, 2016, 6:49 p.m., Boris Shkolnik wrote:
> > docs/learn/documentation/versioned/yarn/yarn-host-affinity.md, line 106
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/45601/diff/1/?file=1322576#file1322576line106>
> >
> >     Please expand 'mapping'. It is not clear from the context without 
> > reading the SAMZA-886.
> 
> Jake Maes wrote:
>     I don't want to duplicate the hadoop documentation that is linked in the 
> first sentence, so can you please specify what is unclear?
>     
>     Would it help if I said "DNSToSwitchMapping"?
> 
> Navina Ramesh wrote:
>     I think the gap is due to the fact that we don't have any documentation 
> on tuning Rack Awarness for Yarn in the Samza website. So, those who are new 
> to Samza will have a tough time digging out the information from the Yarn 
> documentation.
>     1. You can replace "mapping" with "DNSToSwitchMapping" and also, explain 
> what info this mapping maintains, what will happen if the mapping is not 
> configured etc.
>     2. The documentation should also clearly indicate whether RackAwarness is 
> a pre-requisite for correct behavior of host-affinity. 
>     
>     Can you please incorporate the above points? Thanks!
> 
> Jake Maes wrote:
>     > I think the gap is due to the fact that we don't have any documentation 
> on tuning Rack Awarness for Yarn in the Samza website.
>     Why should we? Rack awareness currently only impacts Samza if it's 
> broken. So, I'm not sure what "tuning" would entail. Should we similarly 
> document every other config that has no impact on Samza?
>     
>     > You can replace "mapping" with "DNSToSwitchMapping" and also, explain 
> what info this mapping maintains, what will happen if the mapping is not 
> configured etc.
>     I'll expand on how the mapping impacts Samza, but I don't think it makes 
> sense to restate the hadoop documentation that explains the property. We are 
> not asking users to configure it, we are asking that if they do, they make 
> sure it's robust. If they choose to implement it, it is reasonable to assume 
> that they are familiar with the feature. 
>     
>     > The documentation should also clearly indicate whether RackAwarness is 
> a pre-requisite for correct behavior of host-affinity.
>     Fair enough.

Yarn for Samza definitely deserves a page on the Samza website that we still 
have on our backlog. That said, I don't imply we duplicate docs from other 
websites. It willbe a nightmare keeping track of the changes. 

I think we both agree that we have to document how a config/feature on a 
dependent component impact Samza.


- Navina


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/45601/#review128501
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 1, 2016, 7:49 p.m., Jake Maes wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/45601/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 1, 2016, 7:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for samza, Navina Ramesh, Jagadish Venkatraman, and Yi Pan 
> (Data Infrastructure).
> 
> 
> Repository: samza
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> SAMZA-886 document rack awareness impact on host affinity
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/learn/documentation/versioned/yarn/yarn-host-affinity.md 
> 1d9c29e7ee7fd19fabba55111b5088cc5d36f1fe 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/45601/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jake Maes
> 
>

Reply via email to