----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50174/#review143972 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Looks like this covers my comments. However, the documentation reads like it is OK to do synchronous IO by just throwing more threads at the problem. This is not a good idea. The ability to do synchronous IO is a transition step towards async, not an end state. - Chris Pettitt On July 27, 2016, 11:05 p.m., Xinyu Liu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/50174/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated July 27, 2016, 11:05 p.m.) > > > Review request for samza, Chris Pettitt, Navina Ramesh, and Yi Pan (Data > Infrastructure). > > > Repository: samza > > > Description > ------- > > Update samza web docs with new multithreading api, core and configs. > > > Diffs > ----- > > docs/learn/documentation/versioned/api/overview.md > 6712344e84e19883b857e00549db2acb101c7e0e > docs/learn/documentation/versioned/container/event-loop.md > 116238312df7071747cbbc14bc9c46f558755195 > docs/learn/documentation/versioned/jobs/configuration-table.html > 54c52981c3055b398ee60af50eeaf2592ed0e64f > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/50174/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Test the web pages locally. > > > Thanks, > > Xinyu Liu > >
