Hi Maksim,

I'm in favor of adding Scala 2.12 support as well, thanks for the PR.
I have a few questions about the way JavaConverter APIs and some of the
conversions in the PR work. I'll try it out locally and update the PR with
feedback/questions soon.

Thanks,
Prateek


On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Maksim Logvinenko <mlogvine...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> As far as I can understand nobody is against having Scala 2.12 support in
> Samza master. Can we merge PR then?
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim Logvinenko
>
> On 17 March 2017 at 23:42:16, Navina Ramesh (nram...@linkedin.com.invalid)
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for creating the DISCUSS email!
>
> This is good. It's a good idea to update to 2.12 since it looks like we are
> fully backward compatible with older versions. +1 from me.
>
> Cheers!
> Navina
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Jagadish Venkatraman <
> jagadish1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for starting this discussion and the patch. +1 for supporting
> scala
> > 2.12. I assume the changes are fully backwards compatible with scala
> 2.10,
> > 2.11 (as evidenced by your check-all)?
> >
> > Also, another observation is that the generated Samza binaries will have
> > 2.12 as the suffix for the future release (I this should be totally OK).
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Maksim Logvinenko <
> mlogvine...@gmail.com>
>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > I’ve created JIRA and already submitted patch which adds support of
> scala
> > > 2.12. Here is the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/
> > jira/browse/SAMZA-1135
> > > .
> > > Nothing serious: I’ve removed JavaConversions usage (because it’s
> marked
> > as
> > > deprecated now) and bumped kafka and scalatest versions since previous
> > > versions don’t have scala 2.12 support. I run ./bin/check-all.sh on my
> > > laptop and it was successful for all scala versions (2.10, 2.11 and
> 2.12)
> > > and for both YARN versions.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Maxim Logvinenko
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jagadish V,
> > Graduate Student,
> > Department of Computer Science,
> > Stanford University
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Navina R.
>

Reply via email to