Ran check-all and integration tests passed with one exception.
The following test was flaky and passed on the second attempt for a
specific combination (Scala - 2.12, YARN - 2.7.1 & JDK 8)

> Task :samza-test_2.12:test


testRepartitionedSessionWindowCounter FAILED

    java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<0> but was:<2>

        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)

        at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)

        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)

        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:631)

        at
org.apache.samza.test.operator.TestRepartitionWindowApp.testRepartitionedSessionWindowCounter(TestRepartitionWindowApp.java:72)

We can follow it up with a ticket if we someone else runs into it as well.

+1 (binding)

Thanks,
Bharath

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:12 AM Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ran check-all and integration tests successfully.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 12:02 PM Hai Lu <lhai...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 1.3.1 to redress
> > certain issues found in 1.3.0
> >
> > The release candidate can be downloaded from here:
> > http://home.apache.org/~lhaiesp/samza-1.3.1-rc0/
> >
> > The release candidate is signed with pgp key 0x256F8FA2, which can be
> found
> > here:
> >
> >
> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?search=0x256F8FA2&fingerprint=on&op=index
> > or to directly see the public key here:
> >
> >
> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9ebc0889d43fae16dd0d8f5ba2f50cf4256f8fa2
> >
> > The git tag is release-1.3.1-rc0 and signed with the same pgp key above:
> >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=samza.git;a=commit;h=7b849c047827587dec55ac169f41aac7321ce1cb
> >
> > Test binaries have been published to Maven's staging repository, and are
> > available here:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesamza-1074
> >
> > The vote will be open for 128 hours (ending at 8:00 PM PST Tuesday,
> > 2/18/2020).
> >
> > Please download the release candidate, check the hashes/signature, build
> it
> > and test it, and then please vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> >
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > I ran check-all.sh and integration tests (both YARN and standalone).
> >
> > +1 (non-binding) from my side.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hai
> >
>

Reply via email to