Hey Jonathan,

I've attempted to answer your questions by updating the Javadocs. :)

  
http://samza.incubator.apache.org/learn/documentation/0.7.0/api/javadocs/or
g/apache/samza/system/SystemConsumer.html

Let me know if anything doesn't make sense.

Also, it'd be awesome if you could contribute your file reader
SystemConsumer. This seems like it'd be really useful for a lot of things.
Could you open a JIRA and submit a patch when you're ready?

Cheers,
Chris

On 1/29/14 11:14 PM, "Jonathan Poltak Samosir"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>Currently trying to write a simple Samza System that reads from a file
>and puts the contents onto a Samza-compatible stream. Been basing it off
>the hello-samza WikipediaSystem example so far. The SystemFactory
>implementation seemed to be pretty straightforward (get path to file from
>config and return a SystemConsumer that reads the file at that path),
>although I am not 100% sure of what the purpose of all the SystemConsumer
>interface methods are.
>
>start() and stop() seem fairly self-explanatory, getting called at the
>when the System is started and stopped, respectively (please let me know
>if I am wrong about any of my understandings). register() seems to be
>similar to start() in that it will be called near the beginning of the
>System, although giving access to the SystemStreamPartition and a given
>partition offset, correct? The poll() method seems to be where most of
>the action takes place, and going by its name, it is called often or at
>specified intervals? If so, how does this polling work and how is the
>interval specified?
>Also, the List of IncomingMessageEnvelopes that get returned from poll():
>these are then forwarded on to their specified SystemStreamPartitions
>(first arg in the IncomingMessageEnvelope constructor)?
>
>Anyway, thanks for your time and let me know how far off I am with my
>understanding of this (as I can't get anything working with my current
>system implementation). Will be happy to contribute back Javadoc patch
>reflecting my amended understanding of this interface afterwards.
>
>Jonathan

Reply via email to