Hi guys, I'm good with defaulting to 2.10 and deprecating 2.8 also.
On a related topic SAMZA-16 (JDK 7 support) is looking long in the tooth and given JDK 6 EOL and JDK 8 imminence it'd be nice to validate on the platform. I did a few test builds of Samza on JDK 7 a while ago and found it was intermittently showing some test failures, maybe 1 build in 3. Happy to dig into this but curious if anyone else has investigated at all? Garry -----Original Message----- From: Chris Riccomini [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 25 February 2014 21:44 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to Scala 2.10 as default, deprecating Scala 2.8 support Hey Jakob, Fair enough. I'm all for deleting code. Cheers, Chris On 2/25/14 1:41 PM, "Jakob Homan" <[email protected]> wrote: >No harm and the maintenance support tax is low. I just like to delete >code. If no one speaks up that they're using it, is there any reason >to keep it? > > >On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Chris Riccomini ><[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hey Jakob, >> >> I'm all for moving to 2.10 as the default. I also agree that we >> should continue to support 2.9. >> >> Regarding 2.8 deletion, is there any harm to supporting it right now? >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> On 2/25/14 1:34 PM, "Jakob Homan" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Currently we support Scala 2.8, 2.9 and 2.10. 2.8 is ancient. 2.9 >> >is reasonable and, my guess is that 2.10 is the most common. Our >> >default >>is >> >2.9. >> > >> >Since 2.10 is the most common, it may make sense to make the default >>2.10. >> > >> >Is there anyone out there still relying on 2.8? Are there any >>objections >> >to removing support for it? >> >> ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3705/7121 - Release Date: 02/24/14
