Scott Cantor <cantor.2 <at> osu.edu> writes: > > FYI, I took a stab by hand on this for all the legacy build files. There was > more missing than just that one source file, so that's why it's likely to be > wrong. Basically I'll maintain them based on whatever input I get and in any > given release, they're likely to be hit or miss. >
Many thanks for your effort for clarifying this :-) You suggested in the prev. post, that it would be feasible to submit a fixed version of the VC9 project files for the next release candidate. In short: I could provide this if desired... But to be honest, I'm not familiar with the development process at Apache and I don't know when this point (Release Candidate) would be reached. Regards, Joerg
