> No. OK, any ideas on why it wasn't writing to this file?
> You can't exactly "guess" about whether to include an enveloped transform. > If it's an enveloped signature, it obviously won't work without that. > > I don't know of any reason the order would matter. > > Well, I guess that might suggest confusion over what enveloped signatures > are. If you need it, you can't really omit it. Agreed... I'm confused/uneducated. As I understand it an enveloped signature is one that is included in the XML document I'm signing. So because I was signing <token>, the root element, I needed to include TRANSFORM_ENVELOPED_SIGNATURE. I just tried creating a signature only signing principal (inside token) without using TRANSFORM_ENVELOPED_SIGNATURE and it worked. Still not sure why I cannot apply the TRANSFORM_ENVELOPED_SIGNATURE before TRANSFORM_ENVELOPED_SIGNATURE. Thanks for the help... Bill-
