On 4/4/13 1:08 PM, "Damian Kolasa" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I'm doing a performance comparison of various digital signature schemes >ECDSA, DSA and RSA, and for it to be as complete as possible I'm doing >this for SHA1,256,384,512 digests and various curves/key lengths. Ok. Well, 384 and 512 are simply not defined for DSA. At least based on the most recent algorithm summary I'm aware of: http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlsec-algorithms/Overview.html -- Scott
