On 12/1/14, 3:57 PM, "Colm O hEigeartaigh" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If you don't understand what I mean (especially in point 1) then please >>do a test by writing DOM xml to string in unit test with fail and >>analyze Envelope\Body\EncryptedData\KeyInfo element. You should see ds >>prefix there. > >Yes, but the definition of the ds prefix is not there, despite the fact >that the ds prefix is used. Hence, the XML is not valid.
Just for precision, it's not *well-formed*. Validity is a DTD or schema matter. -- Scott
