Ok +1 from me then. Colm.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Cantor, Scott <canto...@osu.edu> wrote: > On 3/13/15, 12:20 PM, "Colm O hEigeartaigh" <cohei...@apache.org> wrote: > > >The normal process is to create an SVN tag "first", and then to build the > release off that tag. > > I've never done that. It violates my general sense of rightness about > tags, and it also isn't how all my other projects do it, so that's why I > didn't do it here. (You can go back and see all the earlier votes, which > you yourself participated in.) > > > That way we can see the exact SVN revision that we are voting on. In > this case though, it's sufficient to link to the exact SVN revision on > trunk that you used to create the release. Is this it? > > > >http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1665627 > > That's a fair point, Apache using one project in the repo for all projects > is, umm, flat wrong. So that makes it hard to actually tie them together > easily since the revs just keep climbing from other commits elsewhere. > > But anyway, yes, that's the rev I built from, r1665627, and as you see > it's the last commit on that tree. > > -- Scott > > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
