With regards to XML Encryption 1.1, I implemented all of the "Key Wrapping" tests from this spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlenc-core1-testcases/ https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/santuario/xml-security-java/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/xml/security/test/dom/encryption/XMLEncryption11Test.java None of the "Key Agreement" tests are supported though. Colm. On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Sean Mullan <[email protected]> wrote: > I am pretty sure we support all of the MUST/SHOULD requirements in the XML > Signature 1.1 specification. If not, it should be treated as a bug. > > --Sean > > > On 12/10/2015 10:00 AM, Cantor, Scott wrote: > >> On 12/10/15, 9:45 AM, "Pellerin, Clement" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I asked the same question about XMLDSig 2.0 years ago. >>> Santuario responded they will never implement XMLDSig 2.0 since the >>> object model is incompatible. >>> >> >> 2.0 was just a proposal that was abandoned out of lack of interest from >> implementers. Concretely it had some small wins but did nothing to address >> the primary issues that led people to abandon XML so wouldn't have helped >> anything. >> >> The Santuario 1.5.3 release notes mention: >>> >>>> This release features support for new XML Signature 1.1 KeyInfo >>>>> extensions. >>>>> >>>> >> Yes, some of that work was done by my project and donated. >> >> Is the goal of Santuario to support all of XMLDSig 1.1 and XMLEnc 1.1? >>> How far are we in that project? >>> >> >> I'm fairly certain most of XMLEnc 1.1 isn't, seeing as ECDH was the major >> change there and it isn't supported AFAIK. GCM is, but hasn't seen much >> testing since Java 8 is the first version to include it. >> >> I doubt there's a lot of XMLSig 1.1 that isn't already done. >> >> -- Scott >> >> -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
