Hello everyone. >From time to time I get XAdES files that xsec fail to validate. I try to patch sometimes our software, sometimes xml-security-c sources. The problem I'm not so familiar with internals and my fixes *could* bring more problems than benefits.
For example, attached patch fixes two problems. 1) XPath-transformation followed by enveloped-signature transformation was not expected by xsec; 2) particular raw signature has omitted NULL parameter in RSA padding. (I hope I can provide broken xml documents too). Is it worth the effort to report that kind of issues and work on better quality patches?
RsaPadding.patch
Description: Binary data
