On 2/21/24, 4:07 PM, "Berin Lautenbach" <be...@wingsofhermes.org <mailto:be...@wingsofhermes.org>> wrote:
Thanks for weighing in, obviously I think you get some say on this. > and there are extra overheads on you if you have to do a level of > management of the code within the ASF. There are, and I don't dispute it, if I were making the decision alone, the only reason for not forking it is having to consider renaming the artifacts, which creates a lot of work for me on the packaging side. And in fact, we have no plans right now to even produce a subsequent release of our C++ software that would pull in a new version of this code either, so it's quite possible I would fork it in principle but not in practice, depending on how things go. Obviously that becomes totally a "me" decision if it's retired here, that's why I decided it was time to just raise it. > So as the only person maintaining - I’d say go the path that is easiest for > you. I definitely will if there isn't push back on doing it. Thx, -- Scott
