I got the suggestion to forward this to this list, so here it goes.
Ciao,
Marco
Wednesday, November 2, 2005 M. Fioretti wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 10:56:46 AM +0100, Giuseppe Bilotta
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I don't know how much of the problem is intrinsic in the fileformat
>> itself, and how much of it is nonoptimal coding in OOo. It would be
>> interesting how other suites (e.g. KOffice, which I have to try
>> sooner or later) fare on this file :)
> Actually, the KOffice developers are already discussing this:
> http://lists.kde.org/?t=113043237800002&r=1&w=2
VERY interesting read, Marco, thanks. Interesting that they mention
Gnumeric (I didn't even know Gnumeric supported the OOo fileformats?)
as being extremely fast. I have a strong suspicion that many of the
problems they point out in *their* approach also affect OOo ...
Maybe we could forward this thread to the Calc developers,
or at least make them aware of it.
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it
Fedora Core 3 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/
Non � il concetto di intelligenza extraterrestre a essere difficile da
afferrare. E' il concetto opposto che incontra resistenze. I. Asimov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
