Hi Niklas and Eike, I'm in the process of creating a CWS for the solver feature I've been working on for quite some time. I have spoken to Martin Hollmichel and Michael Meeks about this, and the only bits that we need to be sure about is whether or not you guys are okay with the naming of modules.
The way it's set up right now in ooo-build - I may have explained this before but duplication may not hurt - is that we have a separate top-level 'lpsolve' module that houses lp_solve as an external library, and another top level 'scsolver' module that contains the main code for the solver. The lpsolve module contains the unmodified lp_solve 5.5 package that gets unpacked, built, and delivered just like any other external library would. The scsolver module builds libscsolver.uno.so shared library, which dynamically links against liblpsolve55.so to make use of it as LP algorithm backend. So, licensing-wise (lpsolve is LGPL) we should be okay. Let me know if the way it's set up is okay for upstreaming or not. Thanks, Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, OpenOffice.org Calc Hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
