Hi Wojciech et al,
Rose works for me! I like it a lot. Anyone else?
This is really a difficult task. Apart from the legal issues, it's also
the question what associations you want to have.
When I hear "Rose" in a computer context, I think of Rational Rose. When
I hear of it in a "normal" context, I think of many things but not a
statistical extension of OOo ;-)
Well, RCalc is also my favorite. Pity, that this won't work.
Also thought of CalcR or Calc-R, which sounds like "Kalkar", which is a
German town (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalkar). Unfortunately, it is
famous for a nuclear reactor that was built but never used. Hum, not
easy ... ;-)
CalcStaR is also not bad, but indeed is close to StarCalc. But, why not?
So, considering the alternatives so far, I would also vote for this one.
-Bjoern
On 9/3/07, Leonard Mada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
This has proven a difficult task! :) I definitely prefer debugging...
Sometimes.
I really like RCalc -- it was a natural way to go, but Google's search
results made it pretty clear we'd be way too similar to the currently
existing RCalc program.
Aside from that, "roose" is good... It sounds like "ruse" which has the
following definition: a deceptive maneuver (especially to avoid
capture).
I thought about this. Maybe "Rose" is a better alternative?
[Though see also http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/rose/ ]
I think a poll might be useful:
1.) CalcStaR
2.) Rose (or ROOSE, though I now think 'Rose' is nicer)
3.) RO-USE
Any other ideas?
Sincerely,
Leonard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
