Hi Leonard, On Friday, 2008-08-08 01:44:46 +0300, Leonard Mada wrote:
> I recently stumbled upon 2 potentially interesting articles: > > On the accuracy of statistical procedures in Microsoft Excel 2007 > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8V-4S1S6FC-5/1/153b556411c3508840f66b38f74c6186 > > and > The accuracy of statistical distributions in Microsoft® Excel 2007 > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V8V-4S1S6FC-4/1/53635212da2eb0e5750feb645a1d032e Yes, I'm aware of these, and Regina and me were already in contact with Talha Yalta, the author of the second article. > However, I hope that someone will be able to access those files and post > any relevant informations to this list. The main excerpt is: Excel didn't fix most of its inaccuracies, Gnumeric did fix all, and Calc isn't as bad as some people say ;-) We're on our way and, many thanks to Regina again, improve from release to release. Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. SunSign 0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304 7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't send personal mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks.
pgpSpufXr1PNg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
