Hi,

On Sunday, 2009-04-19 20:35:09 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:

> > I can set the result to 0 or set "illegal argument" or perhaps set  
> > "infinity". Please decide.
> 
> I think letting the calculation just run into an error the same as
> occurs for the expression =0^-1 in ScInterpreter::ScExp() is fine, which
> should result in #NUM! being displayed.

Blah, that's of course ScPow() and not ScExp().

  Eike

-- 
 PGP/OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
 Key ID: 0x293C05FD - 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD

Attachment: pgp441LJXtqRg.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to