On 05/25/09 05:33, maoyg wrote: >> I suggest the following behavior: > >> For calculating the continuing interval, not-empty hidden cells are >> treated as if they were not hidden, and empty hidden cell are treated as >> if they do not exist. >> The hidden cell are only considered in drag direction. >> The target area gets the same merge pattern than the source range. >> Dragfilling overwrites all existing values. > > My idea is all hidden cells are treated as if they do not exist, but I need > still to ask ux-discuss's and Niklas's advice.
Non-empty overlapped cells are quite rare, but if they occur, we shouldn't ignore them. But perhaps we should extend Regina's suggestion to all empty cells, even if not overlapped (hidden) by merged cells, so any sequence of 10,empty,20,empty would be continued with 30,empty,40,empty. Niklas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@sc.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@sc.openoffice.org
