Hello,

I've seen a lot of activity in JIRA, does anyone want to add information to
the report? We missed our deadline last month and this one is due on
Wednesday.

- Frank

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 4:18 PM Frank Greguska <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Please add details to the report below:
>
>
>
> ## SDAP
>
> SDAP is an integrated data analytic center for Big Science problems.
>
> SDAP has been incubating since 2017-10-22.
>
> ### Three most important unfinished issues to address before graduating:
>
>   1. Make official SDAP (Incubating) Release
>   2. Improve committer participation
>   3. Improve/create user guide documentation
>
> ### Are there any issues that the IPMC or ASF Board need to be aware of?
>
> Subscription of PPMC members to the @private mailing list should be
> resolved. All PPMC members should now be subscribed to @private. If this is
> not accurate, please advise.
>
> ### How has the community developed since the last report?
>
> New committers have been added.
>
> ### How has the project developed since the last report?
>
>
> ### How would you assess the podling's maturity?
> Please feel free to add your own commentary.
>
>   - [ ] Initial setup
>   - [x] Working towards first release
>   - [x] Community building
>   - [ ] Nearing graduation
>   - [ ] Other:
>
> ### Date of last release:
>
>   XXXX-XX-XX
>
> ### When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
>
> Two new committers were elected in April 2020.
>
> ### Have your mentors been helpful and responsive?
> Are things falling through the cracks? If so, please list any
> open issues that need to be addressed.
>
> ### Is the PPMC managing the podling's brand / trademarks?
> Are 3rd parties respecting and correctly using the podlings
> name and brand? If not what actions has the PPMC taken to
> correct this? Has the VP, Brand approved the project name?
>
> PPMC is not managing the podling's brand / trademarks.
>
> ### Signed-off-by:
>
>   - [ ] (sdap) Jörn Rottmann
>      Comments:
>   - [ ] (sdap) Trevor Grant
>      Comments:
>
> ### IPMC/Shepherd notes:
>
>

Reply via email to