Looking forward to you completing this feature.

Best,
Zongwen Li (ashulin)

JUN GAO <[email protected]> 于2022年8月8日周一 17:40写道:

> It seems very specific and feasible.
>
> Lucifer Tyrant <[email protected]> 于2022年8月8日周一 14:38写道:
>
> > By the way, the row data format information also should be defined in the
> > source connector. The final source config as the following:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *Source {   Kafka {     shema {       fields {          field1 = "STRING"
> >         field2 = "INT"          field3 = "DECIMAL(30, 3)"       }
> > format = "json"     }  }}*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *Source {   Kafka {     shema {       fields {          field1 = "STRING"
> >         field2 = "INT"          field3 = "DECIMAL(30, 3)"       }
> > format = "text"*
> >
> >
> >
> > *        delimiter = ","     }  }}*
> >
> > In most use cases, I think we can support *json* or *text*, if we assign
> > text, we also assign a *delimiter* option in the config file.
> >
> >
> > 范佳 <[email protected]> 于2022年8月8日周一 14:15写道:
> >
> > > Hi, I think it’s great for add new config option named schema, but how
> to
> > > implement complex nested types?
> > > PS:your picture can’t display
> > >
> > > > 2022年8月8日 11:05,Lucifer Tyrant <[email protected]> 写道:
> > > >
> > > > Hi seatunnel community,
> > > >
> > > > According to issue #2371 and #2299, supporting user-defined schema in
> > > source connectors is a import feature for seatuunel.
> > > >
> > > > In this email I want to discuss with you how to implement it.
> > > >
> > > > In my option, I think we can add a new config option named as schema
> in
> > > all source connector source configs and for each connector they can
> parse
> > > their own schema in getProducedType method. The implement function of
> > > parsing schema we can add it in module seatunnel-common. And I agree
> with
> > > your advice @ashulin to conform schema type to the habit of SQL the
> same
> > as
> > > defined in code as the following image show:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What do you think about this?Waiting for your reply!
> > > >
> > > > TyrantLucifer
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Best Regards
>
> ------------
>
> EricJoy2048
> [email protected]
>

Reply via email to