Hi Mohammad Arshad. > How the community is using Zeta. is there any alternate way to have Kerberos and SSL? Currently, the community does not have a corresponding solution, which will be developed later. > is anybody using zeta engine in enterprise level deployment? if yes, how they are managing the security? You can restrict access to the port or define a complex cluster-name to prevent other nodes from joining the cluster. Or try limit node by https://docs.hazelcast.com/hazelcast/5.1/clusters/discovering-by-tcp and https://docs.hazelcast.com/hazelcast/5.1/clusters/discovering-native-clients > is there any issue of stability with Hazelcast community edition? No serious problems have been found so far
Arshad, Mohammad <mohammad.ars...@visa.com.invalid> 于2024年8月19日周一 17:12写道： > Hi All > Seatunnel-engine(Zeta) relies extensively on community edition Hazelcast, > which however, missing some basic features such as Kerberos authentication > and SSL and many other features > Reference: https://hazelcast.com/products/feature-comparison/ > > How the community is using Zeta. is there any alternate way to have > Kerberos and SSL? > is anybody using zeta engine in enterprise level deployment? if yes, how > they are managing the security? > is there any issue of stability with Hazelcast community edition? > > Thanks & Regards > Mohammad Arshad > >
