Hello dev;
The current rest api implementation is to use the native Hazelcast rest
api, which is simple but there are very many limitations, such as the
inability to customize the url, the performance is not as good as jetty,
and scalability is not enough. Below is a detailed comparison.
*Shortcomings of Hazelcast Native REST API*
- Limited Functionality
The Hazelcast Native REST API offers basic functionalities and
lacks support for complex web features such as advanced routing, session
management, and middleware, making it unsuitable for intricate web
applications.
- Insufficient Scalability
Designed primarily for internal REST command handling, the
native REST API lacks high customizability and extensibility, limiting its
ability to meet projects with complex business logic and customization
requirements.
- Performance Bottlenecks
In high-concurrency scenarios, the performance of the native
REST API may lag behind specialized web servers like Jetty, potentially
leading to increased response latency and resource consumption.
- Security Limitations
Hazelcast Native REST API provides limited security features,
lacking advanced authentication and authorization mechanisms, which
elevates the security risks within the application.
- Limited Community Support
Being a part of Hazelcast, the native REST API has relatively
scant community support and documentation resources, making it challenging
for developers to obtain timely assistance when issues arise.
*Advantages of Jetty*
- High Performance and Concurrency Handling
Jetty, as a high-performance Java HTTP server, efficiently
manages a large number of concurrent requests, making it suitable for
applications requiring high throughput and low latency.
- Comprehensive Feature Support
Jetty fully supports the Servlet specification and offers
advanced routing, session management, filter chains, and other middleware
functionalities, making it ideal for building complex web applications.
- Highly Customizable and Extensible
With rich APIs and a plugin mechanism, Jetty allows developers
to customize server behavior and functionalities flexibly based on project
requirements, enhancing system flexibility and maintainability.
- Robust Security Features
Jetty provides extensive security features, including SSL/TLS
support, various authentication and authorization mechanisms, and security
plugins, ensuring the security of data transmission and access controls.
- Extensive Community Support and Documentation
Jetty boasts an active community and comprehensive
documentation, enabling developers to easily access support, share
experiences, and utilize a plethora of open-source plugins and tools,
thereby reducing the learning curve and integration challenges.
- Stability and Reliability
As a mature project, Jetty has been extensively validated in
production environments, offering excellent stability and reliability,
which helps minimize system failures caused by server issues.
*Conclusion*
In summary, the Hazelcast Native REST API presents significant limitations
in functionality, scalability, performance, security, maintenance, and
integration, which hinder its effectiveness in complex front-end and
back-end unified projects. On the other hand, Jetty stands out as a
high-performance, feature-rich, and highly customizable web server capable
of addressing the demands of modern Java applications.
Therefore, it is recommended to phase out the Hazelcast Native REST API and
adopt Jetty as the unified front-end and back-end server solution. This
transition will enhance system performance, strengthen security, improve
maintainability, and provide a robust foundation for future feature
expansions.
--
Best Regards
------------
Liugddx
liug...@gmail.com
